弱国家制度背景下的基层治理:一个系统性文献综述  

Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions:a systematic review of the literature

作　　者：里克·彼得斯 塞尔吉奥·坎波斯 吴雨晨(译) 陈叶盛(审校) Rik Peeters;Sergio A.Campos;Yuchen Wu(Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas(CIDE),Mexico City,Mexico;不详)

机构地区：[1]墨西哥经济研究与教学中心(CIDE) [2]中国人事科学研究院 [3]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》2023年第4期50-72,共23页International Review of Administrative Sciences

摘　　要：对基层治理的研究主要源自全球北方(the Globe North)[1]。因此,当前主流概念是建立在对可能与其他地方基层工作人员工作条件大不相同的制度环境的观察基础上。本文对日益增加的有关弱制度背景下基层治理的文献进行了总结,并融合比较政治学和公共行政学的相关研究,构建了一个连贯的分析框架。我们识别出影响基层工作条件的四个制度因素以及基层工作机构的三种行为模式。基层机构的模式(从临时政策到非正式私有化)可以理解为一种由制度缺陷(例如资源稀缺和问责机制不足)导致的制度水床效应:如果不在制度层面解决公共服务提供的复杂性问题,它就会被推向基层,由那里的基层工作者以高度多元化的方式加以应对。The study of street-level bureaucracy has been dominated by research from the Global North.Mainstream conceptualizations are,therefore,based on observations from institutional contexts that may vary significantly from the working conditions of frontline workers elsewhere.This article takes stock of the growing body of literature on street-level bureaucracy in weak institutional contexts and brings together relevant insights from comparative political science and public administration into a coherent analytical framework.We identify four institutional factors that shape frontline working conditions and three behavioral patterns in frontline worker agency.These patterns in frontline agency-ranging from policy improvisation to informal privatization-can be understood as an institutionalwaterbed effect caused by institutional deficiencies,such as resource scarcity and accountability gaps:if the complexity of public service provision is not tackled at the institutional level,it is pushed towards the street-level where frontline workers cope with it in highly diverse ways.

关 键 词：基层工作 全球南方 制度分析 文献综述 基层治理 弱制度 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]