检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学法学院 [2]广东财经大学疑难案件研究中心
出 处:《数字法治》2024年第4期41-55,共15页DIGITAL LAW
基 金:北京市社会科学研究基金重点研究项目“民法典实施中的疑难问题研究”(项目编号:21FXA004)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:人工智能绘画工具因其便利高效,一经问世就被广泛使用。随之而来的是在应用人工智能绘画工具过程中面临的侵权责任承担问题,其行为主体主要包括提供者、设计者和利用者,应当区分“应用”和“利用”人工智能工具,确定提供者和利用者构成应用人工智能绘画工具的外部关系,提供者和设计者构成内部关系。应用人工智能绘画工具导致的侵权责任可能源于单独侵权行为、共同侵权行为或者竞合侵权行为。如果人工智能绘画工具存在设计缺陷,还应当穿透外部关系,追究设计者的责任。确定应用人工智能绘画工具生成作品的侵权责任,不仅能够保护各主体的合法权益,还可以准确确定各主体的责任范围,发挥降低侵权风险、助力人工智能安全发展的积极作用。Artificial intelligence painting tools have been widely used since their inception for the advantage of convenience and efficiency.However,the problem of infringement liability in the process of applying artificial intelligence painting tool follows.The main subjects applying AI painting tools include providers,designers and users.Based on the distinction between“application”and“utilization”of AI,it should be considered that providers and users constitute external relationship in application of artificial intelligence painting tool,and providers and designers constitute internal relationship.The infringement liability arising from the application of artificial intelligence painting tool may caused by individual infringement,joint infringement or concurrence infringement.If there are design flaws in the artificial intelligence painting tool,beyond external relationship,it should also hold designer accountable.Determining the infringement liability of works generated by using artificial intelligence painting tool can not only protect the legitimate rights and interests of each subject,but also help each subject determine the scope of liability they should take,reduce the risk of infringement,and contribute to the safe development of artificial intelligence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31