检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南法官进修学院科研处 [2]郑州铁路运输法院刑事审判庭
出 处:《数字法治》2024年第5期168-180,共13页DIGITAL LAW
摘 要:为充分发挥人工智能在数字法院中的辅助作用、进一步实现公正与效率,本文通过检视当前人工智能辅助量刑的现状及其应用、伦理、技术困境,进而对人工智能辅助量刑的司法理论进行内涵重释,以实现对人工智能辅助量刑的规制与重塑。本文提出构建分类适用的“人工智能+量刑”体系,以期为以法官为中心、人机协同辅助的司法新未来奠定基础:一是根据介入程度进行阶梯型分类,分为注意力提醒模式、智能量刑建议模式、自动草拟裁判文书模式,并参照案件繁简程度设置三种模式的对应介入边界;二是设置规范便捷的“人工智能+量刑”程序;三是以全周期的统一管理和多元化的全面监督实现权责适应的“人工智能+量刑”监管。To fully leverage the role of artificial intelligence in smart courts and further realize justice and efficiency,this paper examines the current status,applications,ethical and technical dilemmas of AI-assisted sentencing.It reflects on the reasons behind existing challenges and proposes a reinterpretation of judicial theory under AI-assisted sentencing to regulate and reshape it.The paper aims to establish a categorized“AI+Sentencing”system:First,categorizing into levels based on intervention intensity(attention reminder mode,intelligent sentencing recommendation mode,automated judgment document generation mode),with corresponding intervention boundaries based on case complexity;Second,setting up a standardized and efficient“AI+Sentencing”procedure;third,implementing unified management throughout the whole process and diverse comprehensive supervision to adapt responsibilities in the“AI+Sentencing”oversight.This lays the groundwork for a future judiciary centered on judges,assisted by human-machine collaboration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90