《毛诗注疏》引书与清代考据之风  

The Citations in Mao’s Annotations and Commentaries on Poems and the Trend of Textual Criticism in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：李小成[1] 王卓英 LI Xiaocheng;WANG Zhuoying(School of Literature,Xi’an University,Xi’an 710065,China;Research Center for Xinjiang Literature,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830046,China)

机构地区：[1]西安文理学院文学院,西安710065 [2]新疆大学新疆文献研究中心,乌鲁木齐830046

出　　处：《唐都学刊》2024年第6期76-85,共10页Tangdu Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:“《诗经》四大公案和疑难问题新探”(18BZW036)阶段性成果

摘　　要：《毛诗注疏》积汉至唐学人治学之硕果,孔颖达等人集其大成,清人阮元合刻儒家核心经典《十三经注疏》,使其位列其三,居《易》《书》之后。《四库丛书》亦收《毛诗注疏》。该书汇集了汉、唐两代学者对《诗经》作出的重要注解,它主要是魏晋至隋唐数百年间汉学《诗经》注释总结性著述,在撰著中大量引经据典来辅助自己的论点。《毛诗注疏》引书看似经学注疏中的小事情,但它却能反映出历代学术传承中的诸多问题,尤其对某一时代学术主流思想所产生的极大影响。经学注释中引书作为一种治学的方法,值得后人借鉴,以促进学术的多元化发展。Mao’s Annotations and Commentaries on Poems by Mao Heng represents n academic culmination of scholarly achievements from the Han to the Tang dynasties,with figures like Kong Yingda contributing significantly.In the Qing Dynasty,Ruan Yuan compiled a core Confucian classics,Annotations and Commentaries on the Thirteen Classics,placing Mao’s work in the third place,following“I Ching”and“Book of Documents”.The“Four Library Treasuries of Classics”also included Mao’s annotations and commentaries.Mao’s work gathers significant annotations to poems in the“Book of Songs”made by scholars from the Han and Tang dynasties,serving as a comprehensive summary of the interpretations of the“Book of Songs”from the Wei,Jin,and Sui-Tang periods,with frequent citations from classical texts to support its arguments.Although the citations may seem a minor issue within the realm of classical studies,they imply numerous reflections within the academic inheritance across generations,particularly producing considerable influence on the mainstream academic thought in a given era.The practice of citing texts in classical annotations serves as a method of scholarly inquiry that future generations may draw upon to promote the diversified development of academia.

关 键 词：《毛诗注疏》 引书 考据 

分 类 号：I207.222[文学—中国文学]