是什么决定了公共事务研究者寻求政策影响的动机?来自探索性研究的结果  

What determines public affairs researchers’motivations for policy impact?Results from an exploratory study

作　　者：约翰·纳尔逊 斯宾塞·林赛 王秋蕾(译) 熊缨(审校) John P.Nelson;Spencer Lindsay;Qiulei Wang(Center for Organization Research and Design/School for the Future of Innovation of Society,Arizona State University,USA;Center for Organization Research and Design,Arizona State University,USA;不详)

机构地区：[1]美国亚利桑那州立大学未来社会创新学院 [2]美国亚利桑那州立大学公共服务和社区解决方案瓦茨学院 [3]中国人事科学研究院 [4]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》2023年第3期318-337,共20页International Review of Administrative Sciences

摘　　要：从直观上来说,公共政策和公共管理是学术的实践领域,但事实上,许多公共事务研究从来不会影响实践。先前的研究表明,一个给定的研究或研究者是否具备影响力的主要预测因素是研究者这样做的动机。基于对主要公共事务期刊上409篇文章作者的调查数据,我们提出并测试了研究人员在特定研究中及其职业生涯中运用动机的决定因素模型。结果表明,以前的从业经验与感知的职业生涯运用动机正相关,运用奖励与任期和晋升相关,与年度评估无关。此外,特定项目运用动机与感知的职业长期运用动机、学术年龄、实践者提出的研究建议和方法逻辑贡献呈正相关。基于表现出高产的愿望或来自研究同事建议的动机与特定研究运用呈负相关。Although public policy and public administration are intuitively practical fields of scholarship,much public affairs research never affects practice.Previous studies have shown that one major predictor of whether a given research study or researcher achieves impact is the researcher's motivation to do so.Using data from a survey of 409 authors of articles in major public affairs journals,we present and test models of the determinants of researchers’use motivations with regard to specific research studies and over the course of their careers.Results indicate that previous experience as a practitioner is positively associated with perceived career-long use motivation and rewards for use associated with tenure and promotion,although not with annual evaluations.In addition,project-specific use motivation is positively associated with perceived career-long use motivation,academic age,a study suggestion made by a practitioner,and methodological contribution.Motivations based on a desire to appear productive or on suggestions from researcher colleagues are negatively associated with study-specific use.

关 键 词：研究运用 研究动机 政策影响 科学和政策 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]