意大利政策咨询系统中的政府研究机构  

Government research institutes in the Italian policy advisory system

作　　者：玛利亚·图利亚·加兰蒂 安德里亚·里皮 李怡林(译) 于跃(审校) Maria Tullia Galanti;Andrea Lippi;Yilin Li(University of Milan,Italy;University of Florence,Italy;不详)

机构地区：[1]米兰大学社会与政治科学系 [2]佛罗伦萨大学政治与社会科学系 [3]中国人事科学研究院就业创业与政策评价研究室 [4]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》2023年第3期191-210,共20页International Review of Administrative Sciences

摘　　要：在意大利这样的波拿巴主义国家,部长内阁历来是政治化政策咨询系统(政策咨询系统)的中央顾问,而循证决策通常处于边缘地位。然而,最近政治体制的发展推动了波拿巴主义政策咨询体系的多元化,使得对科学和专家建议的需求更加强烈。在这种背景下,政府研究机构(GRIs)作为顾问的角色发生了有趣的变化,可能会在咨询实践不断变化的时期推动循证方法的发展。我们通过对20家意大利政府研究机构的案例研究来调查发展情况,这些机构被聘为有影响力的顾问或通过政策工作支持实施。我们通过文件分析、深入访谈和对20家全球报告倡议组织的问卷调查来获取证据。总体情况表明,政治系统对政策建议的构想发生了转变,并为创新打开了大门。In a Napoleonic country such as Italy,ministerial cabinets have traditionally served as central advisors in the politicised policy advisory system(PAS),while evidence-based policy-making has usually been marginal.Nevertheless,recent developments in political systems have pushed for the pluralisation of the Napoleonic PAS toward a stronger demand for scientific and expert advice.Against this backdrop,the role of government research institutes(GRIs)as advisors represents an interesting change that could potentially fuel the development of an evidence-based approach in a period of changing advisory practices.We investigate these developments through a case study concerning 20 Italian GRIs that are engaged as influential advisors or recruited to support implementation through policy work.We obtained evidence through document analysis,in-depth interviews,and a questionnaire administered to the 20 GRIs.The overall picture displays a shift in conceiving policy advice in the political system and opens the door to innovation.

关 键 词：循证决策 意大利 多元化 政策建议 政策咨询系统 政策工作 研究机构 

分 类 号：D754.6[政治法律—政治学]