欧洲以公共服务为导向的工作动机:基于一项跨国、多层次调查  

Public service-oriented work motives across Europe:A cross-country,multi-level investigation

作　　者：费比安·霍姆伯格 延斯·莫伦韦泽 赵智磊(译) 于跃(审校) Fabian Homberg;Jens Mohrenweiser;Zhilei Zhao(Luiss University,Italy;Bournemouth University,UK;不详)

机构地区：[1]意大利路易斯大学工商管理系 [2]英国伯恩茅斯大学商学院 [3]中国人事科学研究院 [4]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》2023年第3期67-88,共22页International Review of Administrative Sciences

摘　　要：本文通过对欧洲各国公私部门进行比较,将宏观层面的国家制度体系与个人层面的吸引力和社会化程度区分开来,以衡量以公共服务为导向的工作动机。本文认为,国家特有的制度体系决定了一国以公共服务为导向的工作动机水平,从而产生了各国之间的水平差异。反过来,一个国家公私部门在公共服务动机方面的差距反映出个人的吸引力和社会化程度。本文使用2005年和2010年的欧洲工作条件调查数据,证明水平和差距是截然不同的现象,这与目前大多数研究结果相悖。研究发现,对水平和差距加以区分有助于理解以公共服务为导向的工作动机的先决条件,拓展以公共服务为导向的工作动机的制度理论。This article disentangles the country-specific institutional system at the macro level from individual-level attraction and socialization in measuring public service-oriented work motives across European countries through public-private sector comparisons.We argue that country-specific institutions shape the level of public service-oriented work motives of each country and thereby generate level differences across countries.in contrast,public-private sector differences,(i.e.gaps),in public service-oriented work motives within a country reflect aspects of individual-level attraction and socialization.We use the 2005 and 2010 waves of the European Working Conditions Survey and demonstrate that the levels and gaps are empirically distinct phenomena,contrary to current treatment in the literature.We conclude that the distinction between levels and gaps can advance understanding of the antecedents of public service-oriented work motives and support the institutional theory of public service-oriented work motives.

关 键 词：行政传统 欧洲工作条件调查 制度体系 以公共服务为导向的工作动机(公共服务动机) 

分 类 号：D523[政治法律—政治学] D75[政治法律—国际政治]