检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章勤 ZHANG Qin(Huangshan University,Huangshan 245041,China)
机构地区:[1]黄山学院,安徽黄山245041
出 处:《赤峰学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期84-87,共4页Journal of Chifeng University:Philosophy and Social Science Chinese Edition
基 金:黄山学院质量工程教研一般项目“课程思政视域下‘四史’教育融入军事理论课教学创新研究”(2021JXYJ27)。
摘 要:本研究以类ChatGPT产品的应用为例,对某本科高校1210名在校大学生展开问卷调查,从类ChatGPT产品的类型、用途、了解度、使用度、认可度、价值取向等多个角度探讨生成式AI的应用对高校学风建设产生的影响,并探究应对路径和方法。研究结果显示,类ChatGPT产品作为学习工具,正被学生熟悉和运用,合理使用类ChatGPT产品有助于提高学习效率,有助于良好学风的形成。但是,过于依赖生成式AI的应用,可能对高校学风带来潜在的负面影响,可能导致高校大学生学习认知发生偏差、学习态度趋于懒散、学习品格趋于低下、学习方法趋于单一、学习思维趋于僵化。Taking the application of ChatGPT-like products as an example,this study conducted a questionnaire survey on 1,210 college students of an undergraduate university to explore the impact of the application of generative AI on the construction of academic style in colleges and universities from the perspectives of the type of ChatGPT-like products,their use,understanding,usage,recognition,and value orientation,as well as exploring the paths and methods to deal with them.The results of the study show that ChatGPT-like products are being familiarized and used by students as learning tools.Reasonable use of ChatGPT-like products helps to improve learning efficiency,and contributes to the formation of good academic style.However,too much reliance on the application of generative AI may bring potential negative impacts on the academic style of colleges and universities,which may lead to the bias of college students'learning cognition,laziness in learning attitude,low learning character,single learning method,and rigidity in learning thinking.
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.244.172