以“民主”为核心的“台独”话语体系批判  

Critique of the“Taiwan Independence”Discourse System with“Democracy”as Its Core

作　　者：段磊[1,2] 熊鸿亮 DUAN Lei;XIONG Hongliang

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉大学两岸及港澳法制研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《台湾研究集刊》2025年第1期39-55,共17页Taiwan Research Journal

基　　金：2023年度国家社科基金后期资助项目“‘法理台独’批判研究”(23FZZB009)。

摘　　要：“台独”话语体系的发展经历了从以“主权”为核心到以“民主”为核心的嬗变过程,分离主义与“民主”话语在台湾地区政治转型过程中逐步“黏合”。这一变化对内地方面以主权话语和绩效话语为主导的国家统一话语体系形成挑战。要破解以“民主”为核心的“台独”话语体系,一是要明确理清区域性选举与领土主权变更之间不存在关联性,明确台湾地区的政治转型和台湾同胞选举权的行使均不产生“台湾国家化建构”的法律效果。二是要明确所谓“台湾人民自决权”本质上是对“单方分离权”的话语包装,而后者不仅不为中国宪法所允许,也是世界各国宪法均不能容许的情形,不具备法理正当性。The“Taiwan independence”discourse system has evolved from a core focus on“sovereignty”to one centered on“democracy”.Separatism and“democracy”discourses have gradually become intertwined during Taiwan region's political transformation.This shift poses a challenge to China's national unification discourse,which primarily centers on sovereignty and performance.To break the“Taiwan independence”discourse system with“democracy”as its core,two key points must be clarified:First,regional elections are unrelated to territorial sovereignty change,and neither Taiwan region's political transformation nor the exercise of voting rights by Taiwan compatriots can produce the legal effect of“Taiwan's nation-state construction”.Second,the so-called“self-determination of the pepole in Taiwan”is essentially an assertion that the Taiwan region enjoy the“right of unilateral secession”,which is not allowed by the Chinese Constitution and is unacceptable under the constitutions of other countries in the world.In sum,this discourse lacks legal legitimacy.

关 键 词：“民主” “台独”话语体系 “台湾人民自决权” 单方分离权 

分 类 号：D618[政治法律—政治学]