文献分析法是研究方法吗——基于本体论、认识论与方法论的旧问新答  

Is Document Analysis a Research Method:A New Answer to an Old Question Based on Ontology,Epistemology and Methodology

作　　者：姚喜双 王钰[2] YAO Xishuang;WANG Yu(School of Broadcasting and Hosting,Communication University of China,Beijing 100024,China;School of Journalism and Communication,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China)

机构地区：[1]中国传媒大学播音主持艺术学院,北京100024 [2]赣南师范大学新闻与传播学院,江西赣州341000

出　　处：《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期133-142,共10页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：文献分析法长期以来在国内学术研究和教育学领域中存在困惑与争议,有必要从文献、文献综述及文献分析法的本体论、认识论与方法论层面予以澄清与回应。文献的概念在发展中涵盖献贤相当、仪献古通、献言近义的人、事、物、言方面,包括非正式、未发表渠道的来源与服务,可视作史料与证据;文献综述在评价类型家族中面临“非系统”身份危机,但“系统”优势需要被重估与反思;文献分析法按照科学研究的规范程序,可以独立进行定性与定量分析,或者以三角测量、混合方法形式并用。Document analysis has long been puzzling and controversial in domestic academic research and education.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify and respond from the aspects of ontology,epistemology and methodology of document,literature review and document analysis.The definition of document in the development covers the aspects of people esteemed as sages,deeds recorded in history,objects used for ritual offerings in all ages and discourse close to spoken words in semantics including the sources and services from informal and unpublished channels,which can be regarded as historical materials and evidence.Literature review faces the“non-systematic”identity crisis in the family of review typology,but the“systematic”advantage needs to be reassessed and reflected.According to the standard procedures of scientific research,the document analysis can be conducted independently in qualitative and quantitative analysis,or in the form of triangulation and mixed methods.

关 键 词：文献分析法 文献 文献综述 评价类型学 

分 类 号：C03[社会学]