检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张挽乾 潘佰猛 张秋雨 曹芮 张灵强[1,2] Wanqian Zhang;Baimeng Pan;Qiuyu Zhang;Rui Cao;Lingqiang Zhang(Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital,Xining 810001,China;Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital,Xining 810001,China)
机构地区:[1]青海大学附属医院,西宁810001 [2]青海大学附属医院肝胆胰外科,西宁810001
出 处:《中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志》2025年第1期135-139,共5页Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:本综述详细介绍经皮胆囊造瘘术(PTGBD)、内镜下经十二指肠乳头胆囊引流术(ETGBD)和内镜超声引导下胆囊引流术(EUS-GBD)等不同引流方法在急性胆囊炎患者中的应用和研究进展,包括每种引流方法的历史发展、技术特点、临床应用、不良事件、并发症以及长期效果。通过比较各种引流方法的优缺点、适应证等,分析其临床成功率和技术成功率,并探讨未来研究方向。本文旨在为临床实践中的选择策略提供参考,提高急性胆囊炎患者的治疗效果和生活质量。This review presented the application and research progress of different drainage methods in patients with acute cholecystitis,including percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder biliary drainage(PTGBD),endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage(ETGBD)and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-GBD),of patients highlighting historical development,technical characteristics,clinical application,adverse events,complications and long-term efficacy of each drainage method.By comparing advantages,disadvantages,indications of different drainage methods,clinical success rate and technical success rate were analyzed,and the research direction in the future was predicted,aiming to provide reference for selecting strategies in clinical practice and to improve the therapeutic effect and quality of life of patients with acute cholecystitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.158.108