检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:木斋 MU Zhai(School of Liberal Arts,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou Jiangsu 225009,China)
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2025年第1期41-48,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:胡适的红学研究具有结束索隐派猜谜的科学方法论革命性意义,但却在具体结论上陷入自身设置的误区。主要原因有二:其一在方法论上只重视前人之说和版本考据而忽略文本原典特别是对脂评原典的研究,主要从前人说法中寻求依据,却忽视了前人说法在儒家理学文字狱背景下的被遮蔽性;其二,除了其方法论自身的尚未完备之外,还与其红学研究起始阶段的功利性、商业性、仓促性,以及时代所能读到的版本局限性有关。Hu Shi's redology research is revolutionary in terms of its scientific methodology to end the riddles of the Suoyin School.However,it falls into the self-imposed pitfalls in the specific conclusion.There are two main reasons for this.Firstly,in terms of methodology,it only emphasizes the theories of predecessors and textual research on versions while neglecting the original texts,especially the research on the original comments(Zhiping).It mainly seeks evidence from the theories of predecessors,ignoring the obscuring of the predecessors'theories under the background of Confucian literary inquisition.Secondly,besides the incomplete nature of its methodology,the pitfalls are also related to the utilitarian,commercial,and hasty nature of Hu Shi's research at its initial stage,as well as the limitations of the versions available during his time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49