权利救济视角下人工智能行政的风险研判与路径优化  

Risk Assessment and Path Optimization of AI Administrationfrom the Perspective of Rights Remedies

作　　者：王开元 WANG Kaiyuan(College of Humanities and Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期10-16,共7页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：山西省党建研究会重大研究课题“山西乡镇综合执法改革的经验研究”(DJZD22-T05-03)。

摘　　要：人工智能技术在公共行政中的应用加速了治理模式的转型,同时也带来了一系列风险和挑战,主要表现为人工智能行政剥夺了相对人在事前对抗算法权力的能力,只能依靠事后的救济渠道维护自身利益。而传统的行政复议和诉讼无法全面满足人工智能行政的救济需求,需要进一步拓展救济渠道,激活行政申诉在人工智能行政救济体系中的功能价值。基于此,需要制定统一的行政申诉立法并扩大申诉适用范围,为行政申诉在人工智能行政中的适用奠定法治基础,同时强化行政申诉与传统救济机制之间的衔接,丰富救济渠道,保障公民合法权益,确保科技进步与社会价值的和谐统一。The application of AI technology in public administration has accelerated the transformation of governance models.However,it has also brought about a series of risks and challenges,mainly manifesting in the fact that AI administration deprives relative parties of the ability to resist algorithmic power in advance,who can only rely on post relief channels to protect their own interests.On the other hand,traditional administrative reconsideration and litigation cannot fully meet the relief needs of AI administration.It is necessary to further expand relief channels and activate the functional value of administrative appeals in the AI administrative relief system.Based on this,it is necessary to formulate unified administrative appeal legislation and expand the scope of appeal application,so as to lay a legal foundation for the application of administrative appeals in AI administration.At the same time,it is necessary to strengthen the connection between administrative appeals and traditional relief mechanisms,enrich relief channels,safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens,and ensure the harmonious unity of technological progress and social values.

关 键 词：人工智能 权利救济 行政申诉 立法完善 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] TP18[政治法律—法学]