战争社会学:何以可能?何以可为?  

Sociology of War:How is it Possible?How can it be Done?

作　　者：李钧鹏 王东猛 LI Jun-peng;WANG Dong-meng

机构地区：[1]湖北省社会发展与社会政策研究中心

出　　处：《河北学刊》2025年第2期61-72,共12页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2022年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国现代化实践与中国特色哲学社会科学自主知识体系建构研究”(22&ZD193);2024年度华中师范大学优秀研究生教育创新资助项目“战争社会学的思想谱系研究”(2024CXZZ070)。

摘　　要：有史以来,战争是人类社会生活中的永恒主题,但它在社会学中的重要性被有意无意地忽略了。比较不同学科视角下的战争研究,尤其是战争社会学与军事社会学的差异,可以发现战争社会学在学科侧重、研究主题和战争归因等方面存在独特旨趣。对于如何认识战争及其社会后果,战争社会学有四种分析路径:新韦伯主义、文化主义、马克思主义以及福柯主义。检视中国社会学界讨论战争与社会之间关系的研究文献,可以发现,本土学者大多关注战争与国家形成以及战争记忆等问题,倾向于运用新韦伯主义路径和文化主义路径,而较少涉及其他研究主题和分析路径。只有以马克思主义战争学说为指导,同时观照社会科学理论的普遍性与历史经验的特殊性,才能切实推动中国战争社会学研究体系的构建。Throughout history,war has been an eternal theme in human social life,yet its importance in sociology has been intentionally or unintentionally overlooked.Comparing war studies in different disciplines,especially the differences between the sociology of war and military sociology,it can be observed that the sociology of war has unique characteristics with respect to disciplinary focus,research theme,and attribution of war.In terms of how to understand war and its consequences,four approaches can be identified within the sociology of war:neo-Weberianism,culturalism,Marxism,and Foucauldianism.A brief review of research on relations between war and society in Chinese sociology tells us that Chinese scholars focus more on war and state formations as well as memories of war,and lean toward the neo-Weberian and culturalist approaches,whereas other themes and approaches have been less explored.Only by guiding with Marxist theories of war,while paying attention to both the universality of social science theories and particularity of historical experiences can the construction of China’s research system in the sociology of war be effectively promoted.

关 键 词：战争 战争社会学 军事社会学 历史社会学 

分 类 号：C91-06[经济管理]