检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雯欣 张珺璟 辛存林[1] 任珩 许华 朱珂冰 HU Wen-xin;ZHANG Jun-jing;XIN Cun-lin;REN Heng;XU Hua;ZHU Ke-bing(College of Geography and Environmental Science,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China;Gansu Province Longnan Highway Development Center,Longnan 746005,Gansu,China;Northwest Institute of Eco-environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China)
机构地区:[1]西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,兰州730070 [2]甘肃省陇南公路事业发展中心,甘肃陇南746005 [3]中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州730000
出 处:《兰州大学学报(自然科学版)》2025年第1期99-108,共10页Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:甘肃省交通运输厅科技项目(2021-18);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41972020);国家社会科学基金项目(23XGL035)。
摘 要:为评估G212线陇南段泥石流灾害易发区,探究层次分析法-信息量耦合模型(AHP-IVM)对于研究区的适用度,基于638处泥石流灾害点位数据,选取高程、坡度、坡向、地面曲率、地形起伏度、沟谷密度、距水系距离、水土流失敏感性、距断层距离、工程岩组、植被覆盖度和距道路距离12个泥石流灾害关键控制因素作为评价指标,运用AHP-IVM进行泥石流灾害易发性评价及区划.从受试者工作特征曲线、易发性分区合理性条件、典型泥石流3个方面进行评价结果的验证.结果表明,在所有环境变量中,距道路距离和高程是研究区泥石流灾害发生的主要驱动因素;AHP-IVM具有更高的准确率,评价效果更优,基于其将研究区分为低、较低、中、较高、高5类易发区,经合理性条件和典型灾害事件检验,分区结果有较高的置信度,G212线陇南段泥石流易发性整体上沿道路向两侧递减,较高、高易发区内灾害密度超过0.6401处/km^(2),尤其K377~K465段,泥石流灾害高易发区面积最大,占道路两边区域较广.To assess the susceptibility of debris flow disasters(DFD)in the Longnan section of the G212line,the applicability of the analytical hierarchy process-information volume model(AHP-IVM)to the study area was explored.Based on the data of 638 DFD points in the study area,12 key controlling factors for DFD were selected as evaluation indicators:elevation,slope,aspect,ground curvature,terrain undulation,gully density,distance to hydrological network,sensitivity to soil erosion,distance to faults,geological engineering groups,vegetation coverage,and distance to roads.The AHP-IVM was applied for the susceptibility evaluation and zoning of DFD.The evaluation results were verified from three aspects:the receiver operating characteristic curve,rationality of susceptibility zoning,and typical DFD events.The results showed that,of all environmental variables,the distance to roads and elevation were the main driving factors for DFD in the study area;AHP-IVM had a higher accuracy rate and better evaluation effect in this study area,which,based on AHP-IVM,was divided into five susceptibility zones:low,relatively low,medium,relatively high,and high.The zoning results had high confidence after being tested by rationality conditions and typical disaster events.The susceptibility of DFD along the G212 Longnan section generally decreased from the road towards both sides,with the high and relatively high susceptibility areas having a disaster density of over 0.6401 per km2.Especially in the K377-K465 section,the area of high-susceptibility DFD was the largest,covering a wide area on both sides of the road.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171