论马克思早期“扬弃私有财产”构思中的“互映结构”  

On The“Mutually Reflective Structure”in Marx's Early Conception of"Sublation of Private Property"

作　　者：王淼[1] 王淮仟 WANG Miao;WANG Huaiqian

机构地区：[1]吉林大学马克思主义学院,130012

出　　处：《国外社会科学前沿》2024年第9期3-12,共10页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“马克思人类文明形态思想视阈下的人类文明新形态超越性研究”(23BKS010);吉林大学研究生创新研究计划科研项目“形而上学批判视域下马克思颠倒黑格尔辩证法的具体机制研究”(2024CX172)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在马克思早期关于“扬弃私有财产”的构思中存在一种互映式的结构,即以私有财产与其主体本质(劳动)的相互规定来把握其各自的内涵。他从批判国民经济学的体系入手,指明后者通过肯定私有财产的异己性和作为主体的虚假形式而否定了它的主体本质,使其沦为某种潜在的直接性,亦即自在存在。为克服此困境,马克思展开了对黑格尔辩证法的研究并重释了私有财产与劳动的本质关系,使得劳动作为主体本质过渡到抽象的自为存在。在此基础之上,他意识到,只有在历史的运动中逐步消解私有财产的全部规定性,才可能使劳动重新占有私有财产,即作为其主体本质在自为存在中返回自在存在。这种互映结构表明,“扬弃私有财产”构思亦是马克思对劳动作为主体本质的现实性的寻绎与探思。In Marx's early conception of the"sublation of private property,"there is a mutually reflective structure wherein private property and its subjective essence(labor)are understood through their reciprocal determination.He initiated with a critique of the system of national economics,highlighting how this system affirms the otherness of private property and its false form as the subject,thereby denying its subjective essence and reducing it to a latent immediacy,or being-in-itself.To address this issue,Marx delved into the Hegelian dialectics,reinterpreting the essential relationship between private property and labor.This reinterpretation facilitates the transition of labor as the subjective essence to abstract being-for-itself.On this basis,he realized that only through the gradual dissolution of the entire determinacy of private property within the historical process can labor repossess private property,thus returning to being-in-itself as the subjective essence in being-for-itself.This mutually reflective structure underscores that the conception of"sublation of private property"is also an exploration of reality of labor as the subjective essence.

关 键 词：互映结构 私有财产 主体本质 自在自为 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]