检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王新迪 宋歌 袁曦临[1,3] WANG Xindi;SONG Ge;YUAN Xilin(School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,2 Southeast University Road,Jiangning District,Nanjing 211102,China;School of Economics and Management,Nanjing Tech University,30 Puzhu South Road,Pukou District,Nanjing 211899,China;Institute of Information Technology,Southeast University,2 Sipailou,Xuanwu District,Nanjing 210096,China)
机构地区:[1]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏省南京市211102 [2]南京工业大学经济与管理学院,江苏省南京市211899 [3]东南大学情报科技研究所,江苏省南京市210096
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2025年第1期72-79,共8页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“中国期刊国际学术话语权建构路径研究”(22BTQ077)。
摘 要:【目的】通过剖析开放获取(OA)期刊PLOS ONE的运营策略及实施效果,探讨在开放科学环境下,如何在保持开放性和高效传播的同时,保证并提升期刊的影响力。【方法】通过文献梳理、网络调研PLOS ONE的运营策略,采用TOP因子和设计PPCI(post-publication citation index)2个评估指标,分析PLOS ONE在不同发展阶段的开放性、透明度及期刊影响力。【结果】PLOS ONE通过优化和完善期刊运营的制度建设,显著提高了期刊的开放性、透明度以及学术影响力。【结论】PLOS ONE的实践表明,解决OA期刊开放性和质量控制矛盾的关键在于进一步增加开放性与透明度,在合理控制发文量的同时,实现开放同行评议的制度化建设。[Purposes]This paper aims to explore the operational strategies and implementation effects of the open access(OA)journal PLOS ONE,in order to examine how to maintain openness and efficient dissemination while ensuring and enhancing the journals impact in an open science environment.[Methods]Through a literature review and online research,the operational strategies of PLOS ONE are explored,and two evaluation indicators,the TOP factor and the design of the PPCI(post-publication citation index),are used to analyze PLOS ONEs openness,transparency,and journal impact at different development stages.[Findings]The study finds that PLOS ONE has significantly improved its openness,transparency,and academic impact by optimizing and improving the institutional framework for journal operations.[Conclusions]The practice of PLOS ONE demonstrates that the key to resolving the contradiction between openness and quality control in OA journals lies in further increasing openness and transparency,while reasonably controlling publication volume,and institutionalizing open peer review.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104