检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王永跃[1] 王静 刘军 金杨华 WANG Yongyue;WANG Jing;LIU Jun;JIN Yanghua(School of Business Administration,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;School of Management/Research Institute of Digital Governance and Management Decision Innovation,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070,China;Zhejiang Financial College,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,杭州310018 [2]武汉理工大学管理学院/数字治理与管理决策创新研究院,武汉430070 [3]浙江金融职业学院,杭州310018
出 处:《心理学报》2025年第3期479-494,共16页Acta Psychologica Sinica
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AGL022);国家社会科学基金重点项目(22AGL014)资助。
摘 要:在辱虐管理前因研究中,以往研究主要关注辱虐管理持续高水平的前因,然而文献对于辱虐管理变化(增加或减少)的前因却知之甚少。基于社会互动理论和趋近−回避框架,本研究探讨了领导辱虐管理变化通过下属趋近−回避行为变化的中介作用对领导后续辱虐管理变化的差异化效应。通过对配对的263位领导和263位下属进行四阶段的追踪研究,潜变化分数模型结果表明:(1)领导辱虐管理变化通过下属建设性趋近行为(如建设性抵抗)变化、破坏性趋近行为(如功能失调抵抗)变化和回避行为(如防御性沉默)变化的平行中介作用差异化影响领导后续辱虐管理变化。(2)领导自恋调节下属建设性抵抗变化和防御性沉默变化的平行中介路径。本文的研究发现不仅为辱虐管理变化的动态前因研究提供了更加全面和辩证的视角,而且从领导−下属双向视角为辱虐管理的化解之道提供了实践启示。The antecedents of abusive supervision have received heightened attention from researchers and practitioners in recent years.However,there are two unresolved issues related to current research on the antecedents of abusive supervision.First,traditional research considers abusive supervision to be a static leadership behavior,ignoring the dynamic nature of abusive supervision.Although recent studies have embraced a dynamic perspective to focus on the changes in abusive supervision at different time points during the interaction between leaders and subordinates,these studies are still exploring the antecedents of high levels of abusive supervision at specific points in time.Existing theories and findings on abusive supervision(variable level→abusive supervision level)cannot explain the dynamic antecedents of changes in abusive supervision in dynamic leader−follower interactions(variable change→abusive supervision change).Second,the existing literature lacks a framework to integrate the different effects of leader−follower interactions on abusive supervision.To overcome the previously discussed issues,based on social interaction theory and the approach−avoidance framework,we propose that changes in subordinates’approach−avoidance behaviors mediate the effects of changes in former abusive supervision on changes in subsequent abusive supervision,and leader narcissism moderates the proposed indirect pathways.This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study on 263 leaders and 263 subordinates.In the first-wave survey,leaders reported abusive supervision during the previous two weeks,as well as narcissism,agreeableness,and demographic variables;meanwhile,subordinates reported demographic variables.In the second-wave survey,leaders reported abusive supervision during the previous two weeks,and subordinates reported constructive resistance,dysfunctional resistance,and defensive silence during the previous two weeks.In the third-wave survey,leaders reported abusive supervision during the previous two weeks,
关 键 词:辱虐管理 社会互动理论 趋近−回避框架 自恋 潜变化分数模型
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.242.128