多属性学术评价方法的质量诊断问题研究  

Research on the Quality Diagnosis of Multi-attribute Academic Evaluation Methods

作　　者：俞立平 杜维[1] 王延芳 姜茸 Yu Liping;Du Wei;Wang Yanfang;Jiang Rong(School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Statistical Data Engineering Technology&Application,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;China Soft Science Research Society,Beijing 100045,China;Yunnan Key Laboratory of Service Computing,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Kunming 650221,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学统计与数学学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江工商大学统计数据工程技术与应用协同创新中心,浙江杭州310018 [3]中国软科学研究会,北京100045 [4]云南财经大学云南省服务计算重点实验室,云南昆明650221

出　　处：《现代情报》2025年第3期103-109,共7页Journal of Modern Information

基　　金：浙江省自然科学基金重点项目“制造业从数量型创新向质量型创新转型机制研究”(项目编号:Z21G030004);浙江省登峰学科(浙江工商大学统计学)资助(项目编号:2023ZD1A)。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]学术评价方法以指标体系多属性评价为主,评价方法对评价结果具有重要影响。因此将质量诊断思想引入到学术评价中具有重要意义。[方法/过程]本文在对多属性学术评价方法进行分类的基础上,分析了评价方法对学术评价结果的影响机制,并建立了学术评价方法质量诊断框架,提出学术评价方法质量诊断评估体系。[结果/结论]研究结果表明:必须重视评价方法诊断并将其纳入评价日常工作;应建立主客观相结合的评价方法诊断路径;建议学术评价时取消组合评价方法,同时慎用复合评价方法进行学术评价;注重加强主观评价方法的规范性;将评价方法诊断思想前移到评价过程中有利于提高评价质量。[Purpose/Significance]The main academic evaluation method is the multi-attribute evaluation of the index system,and the evaluation method undoubtedly has an important impact on the evaluation result,so it is of great significance to introduce the idea of quality diagnosis into the academic evaluation.[Method/Process]Based on the classification of multi-attribute academic evaluation methods,this paper analyzed the influence mechanism of evaluation methods on academic evaluation results,established the quality diagnosis framework of academic evaluation methods,and put forward the quality diagnosis evaluation system of academic evaluation methods.[Results/Conclusion]The results show that it is necessary to attach importance to evaluation method diagnosis and incorporate it into the daily work of evaluation.It is necessary to establish an evaluation method diagnosis path combining subjective and objective methods.It is suggested that the combination evaluation method should be cancelled and the compound evaluation method should be used cautiously in academic evaluation,and pay attention to strengthen the standardization of subjective evaluation methods.It is beneficial to improve the quality of evaluation to advance the diagnostic thought of evaluation method into the evaluation process.

关 键 词：学术评价 多属性评价 质量诊断 指标体系 复合评价 组合评价 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学] G255.2