自然保护地役权法理探析  

A Jurisprudence analysis of the conservation easement in Nature Reserves

作　　者：朱志权[1] 汪嘉婧 ZHU Zhiquan;WANG Jiajing(School of Grammar and Arts East China University of Technology,Nanchang Jiangsu 330013 China)

机构地区：[1]东华理工大学文法与艺术学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《河北环境工程学院学报》2025年第1期23-29,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering

基　　金：江西省社会科学“十四五”(2024年)基金项目(24FX03);研究阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目(21ZDA091)。

摘　　要：现行生态补偿机制低效、僵化日显,难以有效满足生态环境保护的迫切需求。而兼具公私双重属性的自然保护地役权,通过私法手段规制公法领域利益,为自然保护地建设开辟新路径。从必要性角度看,自然保护地内土地权属复杂,且生态保护与经济发展之间的冲突日益加剧,使得构建自然保护地役权具有现实迫切性。从正当性角度看,该权利建构符合公平正义原则和人与自然和谐共生的社会发展趋势,并切合平等对话与共识构建的理性基础。从经济学和法学双重视角看,借助外部性内化和政府职能的有效运作,结合现有物权理论与法律框架,构建自然保护地役权在实践中具备可行性。The current ecological compensation mechanism is increasingly inefficient and rigid failing to effectively meet the urgent demands of environmental protection.The nature reserve ease-ment which incorporates both public and private attributes regulates public law interests through private law means opening up new pathways for the development of nature reserves.From the per-spective of necessity the complex land tenure within nature reserves and the growing conflict be-tween ecological protection and economic development highlight the urgent need for the establish-ment of nature reserve easements.From the perspective of legitimacy the construction of this right aligns with the principles of fairness and justice as well as the societal trend of harmonious coexis-tence between humans and nature providing a rational foundation for equal dialogue and consen-sus-building.From both economic and legal perspectives by internalizing externalities and ensuring effective governmental functions the construction of nature reserve easements is feasible within the existing property rights theory and legal framework.

关 键 词：自然保护地 保护地役权 生态保护 公平正义 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]