检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘恒源 LIU Hengyuan(University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)
出 处:《山西警察学院学报》2025年第1期29-37,共9页Journal of Shanxi Police College
摘 要:国内外关于放弃重复侵害行为已有较多讨论,存在未遂犯说、中止犯说、折中说等代表性学说,但既有的各种学说均有一定缺陷。限定中止犯说通过犯罪手段的变更对犯罪中止的成立加以限定,可以平衡判断的准确性和合理性。内在理据上,应当认可犯罪手段的变更对于刑法评价具有重要意义,且犯罪手段的客观性外观与学说的主观说本质并不矛盾;具体适用上,限定中止犯说也能得出与既有司法实践大体一致的判断结论。The abandonment of repeated infringement has been discussed considerably both domestically and internationally,with representative theories including the attempted crime theory,the crime suspension theory,and the middle-course theory.However,each of these existing theories has certain defects.The limited crime suspension theory delimits the establishment of crime discontinuance by altering the criminal means,which can balance judgments accurately and reasonably.In terms of inherent rationale,it should be acknowledged that changes in criminal means are of great significance for criminal law evaluation,and the objective manifestation of criminal means does not contradict the subjective nature of the theory.And in terms of specific application,the limited discontinued crime theory can reach conclusions that are generally consistent with the existing judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.233.20