检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童永峰 马幸荣 Tong Yongfeng;Ma Xingrong(Yili Normal University,Yining Xinjiang 835000)
机构地区:[1]伊犁师范大学,新疆伊宁835000
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2024年第6期10-14,共5页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区社会科学基金重点项目“稳步推进全面依法治疆实践研究”(22AZD007)阶段性研究成果;伊犁师范大学“一带一路”发展研究中心开放课题一般项目“一带一路”背景下“双碳”目标实现的法律体系研究(YDYL2023YB024)。
摘 要:近年来,法院系统始终坚持政治建设为纲领,以深化改革为驱动力,以建立法院审判绩效考核管理平台为抓手,实现了衡量、评价法院整体审判绩效直观性和可比性。目前,审判绩效考核机制尚有不足,不利于实现考核指挥棒导向性、监督功能。设置科学合理的案件权重系数,可激发基层法院干警潜力,提升司法效能上台阶。In recent years,the court system has consistently prioritized political capacity building as its guiding principle,driven by deepened reforms,and focused on establishing a Court Trial Performance Evaluation and Management Platform.This has enabled the achievement of intuitive and comparable metrics for measuring and evaluating the overall trial performance of courts.However,deficiencies persist in the current trial performance evaluation mechanism,which hinder the realization of its intended role as a guiding and supervisory tool.Establishing scientifically rational case weighting coefficients could unlock the potential of judicial personnel in basic-level courts and elevate judicial efficiency to a higher level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.179.200