社会治理中的刑法前置与刑罚抑制  

Early Intervention of Criminal Law and Restraint of Criminal Penalty in Social Governance

作　　者：陈伟[1] CHEN Wei

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《政治与法律》2025年第1期141-160,共20页Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究”(项目编号:17XFX009)的研究成果。

摘　　要：国家治理体系和治理能力现代化需要重新审视刑法功能,“刑法参与”是社会治理视域下的刑法本位及其实践表达。社会动态发展促进了刑法规范的活性化特征显现,基于政策治理需要的刑法参与衍生出积极主义趋势,拓宽了罪刑规制的辐射领地、延展了刑权力的驰骋疆域。社会治理的实践动因促进作为最后防线阵地的刑法前置,罪刑规范的实体构造要求刑法坚守保障法的品格特质,因而在刑法前置拓展与坚守保障法本位之间存在紧张关系。刑法前置作为刑法参与社会治理的表现形态,参与性角色决定了刑罚的不可或缺与刑罚功能的有限发挥,不能借此肆意扩张刑罚和推行刑罚全覆盖,应当在多元责任后果中防范刑罚规制的功能逾越。刑罚抑制作为理念与技术的融合,需要在规范体系内外进行综合审视,赋予刑罚反向制约刑法介入的积极性,通过后果审查与处罚必要性对刑法适用进行实质评价和理性限缩,合理吸纳行为人刑法的有益内核,从而在进退有序之间实现刑法参与社会治理的功能协调。For the modernization of national governance system and capacity,it is necessary to re-examine the functions of criminal law."the participation of Criminal law"is expression of its central role and its practice in the context of social governance.The dynamic social development has promoted the emergence of characteristics of activation of criminal law norms,and the participation of criminal law based on the needs of policy governance has resulted in the trend of positivism of criminal law,and broadened the reach of criminal law regulation and extended the domain of criminal power.The practical motivation of social governance promotes the early intervention of criminal law as the the last line of defense,and the substantive structure of norms on crime and punishment requires criminal law to adhere to the character and feature of a guaranteeing law,thus there is a tension between the criminal law's early intervention and insistence on the stance of a guaranteeing law.The early intervention of criminal law is the manifestation of its participation in social governance,governance,thus the participatory role determines the indispensability of criminal penalty and the limited exertion of the function of criminal penalty,which means we cannot expand criminal penalty without restraint and implement the full coverage of criminal penalty and we should prevent the function of criminal penalty as the regulation from exceeding in the consequences of multiple liabilities.Regarding restraint of criminal penalty which is the integration of concept and technology,it is necessary to conduct comprehensive examination inside and outside the normative system,endow the criminal penalty with the positiveness of conversely restricting the involvement of criminal law,make substantive appraisal and rational narrowing of the application of criminal penalty through consequence examination and the necessity of punishment,and reasonably absorb the beneficial core of the perpetrator-centered criminal law,so as to ensure the functional coordina

关 键 词：社会治理 刑法功能 刑法参与 刑法前置 刑罚抑制 

分 类 号：DF62[政治法律—刑法学]