行政执法意义上公法规范域外适用制度的逻辑展开  

Logical expansion of the extraterritorial application of public law norms in the context of administrative law enforcement

作　　者：余涛 YU Tao

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期84-94,151,共12页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“美国全球单边经济制裁中涉华制裁案例分析与对策研究”(21&ZD208);国家社会科学基金青年项目“新《证券法》实施背景下存托凭证信息披露规范的适用研究”(20CFX049)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在行政执法意义上,公法规范域外适用的一般逻辑尚未被学界所重点研究。公法规范域外适用制度的主要特征是贯彻国家意志并伴以利益衡量。公法规范域外适用的步骤是先判断行政机关有无域外执法管辖权,再判断行政机关是否应当启动域外执法管辖权,最后是实体性公法规范的适用。判断行政机关有无域外执法管辖权的标准是看特定的公法法典中是否规定了域外执法管辖权规范,如果有规定,则行政机关享有域外执法管辖权,反之则否。理性人标准是判断行政机关应否启动域外执法管辖权的一般标准。在实体性公法规范的域外适用环节,行政机关应从构成要件的符合性和有责性两方面对域外对象进行双层审查;通过双层审查后,行政机关还应对处罚的必要性和可行性进行判断。In the context of administrative law enforcement,the general logic of the extraterritorial application of public law norms is not the focus of the scholarly research.Its main characteristic is to implement state will and to balance interests.The steps involve first determining whether the administrative authority has extraterritorial law enforcement jurisdiction,then determining whether they should initiate it,and lastly the application of substantive public law norms.The standard for the first step is to see whether specific public law codes have stipulated norms for it.The rational person standard is a general standard for judging whether the administrative authority should initiate extraterritorial law enforcement jurisdiction.In the third step,the administrative authority should conduct a dual review of the extraterritorial objects in terms of the conformity of the constituent elements and the presence of responsibility.After the dual review,the administrative authority should also assess the necessity and feasibility of the punishment.

关 键 词：公法规范 域外适用 理性人 行政执法 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]