侵犯公民个人信息罪缓刑适用的实践检视与规则建构——以刑法第七十二条司法适用为中心展开  

Practice Review and Rule Construction of Inappropriate Application of Probation for the Crime of Infringing Citizens’Personal Information——Centered Around the Judicial Application of Article 72 of the Criminal Law

作　　者：朱珊珊 刘杨 ZHU Shanshan;LIU Yang(Law Department,Fujian Police College,Fuzhou,Fujian 350007;Weidenbaum Center,Washington University in St.Louis,St.Louis,MO,63130,USA)

机构地区：[1]福建警察学院法律系,福建福州350007 [2]美国华盛顿大学圣路易斯分校威登堡姆研究中心,美国密苏里州圣路易斯市63130

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期135-144,共10页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2021年度福建省社科基金特别委托福建省法学会专项课题“惩治电信网络领域侵犯公民个人信息犯罪研究”(编号:FJ2021TWFX007)。

摘　　要：对侵犯公民个人信息罪的刑事被告人适用缓刑已成为司法裁判的量刑取向,而认罪认罚从宽制度为缓刑的大量适用提供了制度空间。司法实践中出现的缓刑不当适用的问题,表现为差别化适用和不合理适用两种情形。产生此种现象的主要原因是司法机关对刑法上缓刑适用构成要件理解过于宽松,不仅自由裁量缺乏一致性司法标准,而且以宣告刑作为缓刑适用的依据,显然不符合刑法上缓刑适用的限制性规则。为了规范缓刑适用,应当从刑法的基本原理出发,通过技术层面建构缓刑适用要件评价表、规范层面建构以责任刑为中心的缓刑适用规则来有效消解缓刑司法适用的实践难题。The application of probation to the accused for the crime of infringing citizens’personal information has become a sentencing orientation in judicial judgments,and leniency system of confession and punishment provides institutional space for the extensive application of probation.Under the condition of excessive application of probation,there are issues in the inappropriate application of probation in judicial practice,manifesting in two situations:differential application and unreasonable application.The main reason for this phenomenon is that judicial authorities have adopted an overly loose understanding of the constituent elements of probation application in criminal law.Not only does their discretion lack consistency in judicial standards,but using declared punishment as the basis for probation application,which clearly does not comply with the restrictive rules of probation application in criminal law.In order to standardize the application of probation,we should return to the normative meaning of Article 72 of the Criminal Law.Starting from the basic principles of the Criminal Law,we should construct an evaluation table for the elements of probation application at the technical level to achieve the rationalization of judgments,and construct probation application rules centered on responsibility punishment at the normative level to achieve the legitimacy of judgments,thereby effectively resolving the practical difficulties of probation judicial application.

关 键 词：侵犯公民个人信息罪 缓刑适用 宣告刑 责任刑 

分 类 号：F832.3[经济管理—金融学]