检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张佩国 ZHANG Peiguo
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学人文学院历史系,上海200240
出 处:《学术月刊》2025年第1期191-201,共11页Academic Monthly
摘 要:以往关于阶级的看法,大致是将其分别界定在几个层面——作为生产关系的阶级剥削关系、作为政治形态的阶级统治和阶级斗争、作为政治文化的阶级意识、作为社会不平等的阶级分层。新社会史阶级文化研究和马克思主义人类学的工厂民族志研究,则给我们研究阶级问题提供了整体史启发。生产方式理论是唯物史观之要义,在一定程度上富有整体史意义,有利于破除以往关于社会历史“再结构化”的教条,重新解释作为历史整体的“社会形态”。By now,the views on class are roughly defined at several levels—class exploitation relations as production relations,class rule and class struggle as political forms,class consciousness as political culture,and class stratification as social inequality.The study of class culture in the new social history and the study of factory ethnography in Marxist anthropology provide us with holistic historical inspiration for studying class issues.The theory of production methods and social forms,as the core content of the materialist view of history,has the significance of the holistic history of society.It is conducive to cleaning up the dogmatic materialist view of history and mechanically dividing the economy,politics,and culture of the overall history of society.Therefore,facing the essence of Chinese history,it truly turns inward and reinterprets the social forms as a whole of history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.114