尼加拉瓜诉哥伦比亚“外大陆架划界案”的外溢效应及中国应对  

Spillover Effects and China's Response in the Case of Nicaragua v.Colombia on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf

作　　者：张晏瑲 孙洁 ZHANG Yen-Chiang;SUN Jie

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院

出　　处：《国际法学刊》2025年第1期56-76,155,156,共23页Journal of International Law

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科重大培育项目(项目号:3132023705)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：尼加拉瓜诉哥伦比亚“外大陆架划界案”的裁决宣告“一国对其领海基线量起200海里以外大陆架的权利不得延伸到另一国领海基线量起200海里以内海域”为一项习惯国际法。虽然就现有国际法规范以及国际实践而言,国际法院判决的合理性以及合法性有待商榷,但该判决的潜在影响仍不容忽视。国际法院在引导国际海洋制度发展的同时,也会影响中国在中日大陆架划界中的权利主张,为争端解决埋下隐患。对此,为保障中国对于东海大陆架的合法权益,中国可以在坚持原主张的基础之上,积极探索专属经济区同大陆架分别划界的方案,并以东海合作开发共识为基础,进一步深化同日本在东海的利益合作,促进中日东海争端的和平解决。The case of Nicaragua v.Colombia on the delimitation of the continental shelf established view that“a State's rights to its continental shelf beyond the baseline of 200 nautical miles from its territorial sea shall not extend into the sea area within 200 nautical miles of the baseline of another State”as customary international law.Although the reasonableness and legitimacy of the ruling remain open to debate under existing international law norms and practices,its potential impact cannot be overlooked.While guiding the development of the international maritime system,the IC's decision may also affect China's claims in the delimitation of the continental shelf with Japan,potentially exacerbating tensions in this area.To safeguard China's legitimate rights over the East China Sea continental shelf,China can adhere to its original claims while actively exploring new delimitation schemes that separately delineate the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf.Moreover,based on the consensus on joint development in the East China Sea,China can further deepen its cooperative interests with Japan to promote the peaceful resolution of disputes in the EastChina Sea.

关 键 词：大陆架划界 习惯国际法 专属经济区 中日争端 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]