辽金天辅议和发覆——从《金史·斡鲁古孛堇传》谈起  

Initiation and Failure of Tianfu Peace Negotiations between the Liao and Jin Dynasties——An Examination Based on the Biography of WoLugu Bojin in the History of Jin Dynasty

作　　者：常志浩 Chang Zhihao

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学历史文化学院,116081

出　　处：《中国边疆史地研究》2024年第4期143-154,220,共13页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“石刻所见辽代史料编年辑考”(24CM2093)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：辽金“显州交涉”可视为天辅议和的先声,通过梳理“显州交涉”的时间线可知,天辅议和正式开始于天辅二年正月,发起方是辽朝,原因在于其反攻金朝的战略受挫。杨朴“封册十事”是辽金双方经六次交涉在天辅二年八月所达成的议和条款,并非金朝单方面的要求,或者杨朴的个人建言。杨朴的贡献在于将议和从疆界谈判推向了封册谈判。然而因辽人议和不诚,封册之事经七次交涉,至天辅四年三月仍未完成。其后,阿骨打起兵攻打上京,意在以打促和。可惜上京失陷造成了天祚的战略误判,议和功败垂成。The“Xianzhou Negotiations”can be considered a precursor to the Tianfu Peace Negotiations.By tracing the timeline of the“Xianzhou Negotiations”,we find that the formal initiation of the Tianfu Peace Negotiations occurred in the first month of the second year(1118)of Tianfu era,initiated by the Liao dynasty due to setbacks in their strategy to counterattack the Jin dynasty.The“Ten Articles of Enfeoffment and Investiture”proposed by Yang Pu were the terms reached after six rounds of negotiations in August of the second year(1118)of Tianfu era,and were not merely unilateral demands from the Jin Dynasty or personal suggestions from Yang Pu.Instead,Yang Pu played a crucial role in shifting the focus of the negotiations from territorial disputes to matters of enfeoffment and investiture.However,due to the insincerity of the Liao negotiators,the enfeoffment and investiture remained unresolved after seven rounds of discussions.By March of the fourth year(1120)of Tianfu era,no agreement had been reached.Subsequently,Aguda launched an attack on Shangjing(the Upper Capital of Liao Dynasty),intending to force negotiations through military action.Unfortunately,the fall of Shangjing resulted in a strategic miscalculation by Emperor Tianzuo of the Liao Dynasty,ultimately leading to the collapse of the peace negotiations.

关 键 词：天辅议和 显州交涉 “封册十事” 辽金 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]