检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Zhang Shiming 张世明
机构地区:[1]School of Law of Renmin University of China
出 处:《China Legal Science》2025年第1期3-34,共32页中国法学(英文版)
基 金:an initial result for the key projects supported by the National Social Science Foundation in the later stage, entitled On the General Theory of Tax Law Methods (No. 21BXW039)。
摘 要:Studies in China frequently discuss the introduction of a system that disregards corporate personality in anti-tax avoidance.This system differs from the penetrating taxation system,which operates through tax laws.The rationale for introducing such a system is often misguided,warranting further consideration.This study employs an empirical approach to furnish a comparative perspective between the system of disregarding corporate personality and the system of penetrating taxation.The application of anti-conduit rules to conduit companies does not rely on the legal doctrine of disregarding corporate personality.Moreover,the rule of identifying substantive beneficiaries does not entail the system of disregarding corporate personality.Therefore,tax avoidance behavior is a legally appropriate and effective act in private law and does not involve temporary deprivation of corporate personality in corporate law.中国税法学界主张在反避税中引入公司法人人格否认制度的观点颇为盛行。公司法人人格否认制度与税法穿透课税制度不同。税法引入法人人格否认制度肯定论的证成理据值得商榷。公司法人人格否认制度与税法穿透课税制度之间的比较视野通过实证研究路径得以展开。对导管公司适用的是反导管规则而并非援用否定法人人格法理。认定实质受益人规则并非否认公司法人人格制度的适用表现。受控外国公司规则仅仅涉及税法法人格而非公司法法人格。避税行为在本质上是一种脱法行为,其既然在私法上属于适法有效的行为,就不存在进行公司法法人人格否定的暂时性褫夺问题。
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7