胡震亨《读书杂录》的考据学成就与明末治学风尚  

Achievements in the Textual Research of Hu Zhenheng's Reading Miscellaneous Notes and the Scholarly Research Orientation in the Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：陈许 CHEN Xu(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070)

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学文学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《贵州师范学院学报》2025年第1期1-8,共8页Journal of Guizhou Education University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“《唐诗鼓吹》汇校汇注汇评及研究”(22XZW041);青海省省级社科重点项目“国家通用语言文字助力民族教育质量提升”(22ZCZD004)。

摘　　要：明代中叶以后,一批有识之士掀起了“黜虚崇实”的思潮,对程朱理学和陆王心学展开深入的反思与批判,倡导回归经典,主张通过对古籍求真求实的考证,以达到“经世致用”的目的。胡震亨是明末著名的考据学家,其《读书杂录》记叙了大量的考据成果,主要体现在考证字词声韵、辨析名物典故、评判社会史实和质疑佛道义理上,集中反映了胡震亨的考据学成就与明末治学风尚的转变,同时给后继的清学也指明了方向。After the middle of the Ming Dynasty,a group of insightful people set off the trend of"deposing the virtual and worshiping the reality",launched in-depth reflection and criticism of the Neo-Confucianism of Cheng Yi,Cheng Hao and Zhu Xi,as well as the School of Mind of Lu Jiuyuan and Wang Yangming.They advocated returning to the classics and held that through truth-seeking and fact-based textual research on ancient books,the goal of"humanistic pragmatism"could be achieved.Hu Zhenheng is a famous textual researcher in the late Ming Dynasty,his Reading Miscellaneous Notes contains a lot of textual research productions,mainly reflects in proving words and rhymes,discriminating names and allusions,judging social facts and querying the Buddha and Daoist principles.It centrally reflects Hu Zhenheng's achievements in textual research and the transformation of the scholarly fashion in the late Ming Dynasty.At the same time,it also points out the direction for the academic studies in the subsequent Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：胡震亨 《读书杂录》 考据学 明末 治学 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]