检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱智超 李晓雨 闻效仪 罗文豪[3] QIAN Zhichao;LI Xiaoyu;WEN Xiaoyi;LUO Wenhao(China University of Labor Relations,Beijing,China;Renmin University of China,Beijing,China;Northern University of Technology,Beijing,China)
机构地区:[1]中国劳动关系学院劳动关系与人力资源学院,北京市100048 [2]中国人民大学商学院 [3]北方工业大学经济管理学院
出 处:《管理学报》2025年第2期297-305,共9页Chinese Journal of Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72132009,72072002);中央高校基本科研业务专项基金资助项目(24ZYJS004)。
摘 要:以资源保存理论为基础,通过对23家企业的297名员工的两阶段问卷调查,探讨了剥削型领导对员工适应性绩效的负面影响。研究结果表明:剥削型领导显著降低员工的工作繁荣和适应性绩效;工作繁荣在剥削型领导与员工适应性绩效之间起到中介作用;同事支持调节剥削型领导与工作繁荣的关系,同时调节工作繁荣在剥削型领导与员工适应性绩效之间的中介作用,即当同事支持较高时,剥削型领导与工作繁荣的关系以及工作繁荣的中介效应更弱。Based on the Conservation of Resources(COR)theory,this study explores the negative impact of exploitative leadership on employee adaptive performance through a two-stage survey of 297 employees from 23 companies.The results indicate that exploitative leadership significantly reduces both thriving at work and employee adaptive performance.Thriving at work mediates the relationship between exploitative leadership and employee adaptive performance.In addition,coworker support moderates the relationship between exploitative leadership and thriving at work,as well as the mediating effect of thriving at work between exploitative leadership and employee adaptive performance.Specifically,when coworker support is high,both the negative relationship between exploitative leadership and thriving at work and the mediating effect of thriving at work become weaker.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.230.40