检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金虎 郑燕 WANG Jin-hu;ZHENG Yan
机构地区:[1]甘肃政法大学法学院 [2]甘肃省人民检察院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第1期42-47,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
基 金:2024年甘肃省人民检察院检察理论研究课题“检察机关内设机构改革情况研究”(GSJC2024-49-01)。
摘 要:随着当前我国检察系统司法责任制改革的不断深入推进,原有的发挥检察院集体智慧的检察委员会制度在具体的司法实践运行中表现出议事决策程序虚置化、检务工作不公开、阻碍检察官工作积极性等诸多现实司法困境。因此,必须通过合理定位检察委员会的工作职能,对检察委员会制度的运行进行完善,健全检察委员会组成人员的遴选机制、实行委员决议备案制、扩大列席议事决策事项的人员范围等相关路径,才能促进司法改革的步伐,适应司法责任制改革的需要。With the continuous and in-depth advancement of the reform of the judicial responsibility system within the procuratorial system in China,the original procuratorial committee system,which leverages the collective wisdom of procuratorates,has encountered numerous practical judicial difficulties in specific judicial practice,including formalistic decision-making procedures,lack of transparency in procuratorial work,and hindrance to the work enthusiasm of procurators.Therefore,it is imperative to promote the pace of judicial reform and adapt to the needs of the reform of the judicial responsibility system by reasonably positioning the working functions of the procuratorial committee,improving the operation of the procuratorial committee system,perfecting the selection mechanism for the members of the procuratorial committee,implementing a filing system for committee resolutions,and expanding the scope of personnel who attend and participate in decision-making matters.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15