民事诉讼证据规则比较视域下电子文件管理及真实性保障模式研究——以我国与北美为例  

A Study on Electronic Records Management and Authenticity Protection from the Perspective of Comparative Study of Civil Litigation Evidence Rules:Taking China and North American Countries as an Example

作　　者：潘未梅[1] PAN Weimei(Management School,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学管理学院,天津300387

出　　处：《档案学研究》2025年第1期113-121,共9页Archives Science Study

摘　　要：为深刻理解民事诉讼证据规则对文件与档案管理工作的影响,并对相关概念形成基于背景的认识,本研究立足文件作为民事诉讼证据视角,基于法条对比分析我国与北美民事电子文件证据规则,聚焦电子文件所属证据类型、电子文件真实性评定规则、电子证据开示制度,并对我国与北美电子文件证据规则的异同、数字环境下文件可靠性保障理论研究必要性、“原件”概念的演变、证据开示制度对文件管理工作的影响等进行了讨论。To deeply understand how civil litigation evidence rules inf luence records and archives management work,and to form a context-based understanding of related concepts,from the perspective of records as civil litigation evidence,this study compares electronic records evidence rules in Chinese and North American civil litigations,focusing on the types of evidence to which electronic records belong,electronic records authenticity assessment rules,and electronic evidence discovery systems.The paper also explores differences between Chinese and North American electronic records evidence rules,necessity to conduct theoretical investigation of records'reliability,evolution of the concept of"original",as well as the impact of e-discovery rules on records management work.

关 键 词：电子文件 真实性 证据 原件 证据开示 

分 类 号：D908[政治法律—法学理论] D915.2[政治法律—法学] G276[文化科学—档案学]