国际知识产权协定争端解决功能的类型化分理及冲突消解——以RCEP区域协定为切入点  

Typological Classification and Conflict Resolution of Dispute Settlement Functions in International Intellectual Property Rights Agreements-Starting from RCEP

作　　者：戴璐嵘 DAI Lurong(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430000,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430000

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期51-57,共7页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“《中国国际私法典》涉外民事专属管辖权规则编撰”(23BFX148)。

摘　　要：知识产权是国际经贸交往的重要内容,也是各类国际协定所关切的重要方面。因受诸多外部因素影响,现既存国际协定对知识产权的规定难以贯彻统一,加上原本就繁杂交错的条约关系,各协定在争端解决上的条文位阶和适用规则边界更加模糊,不同立法水平、立场站位和利益诉求更分化了各协定对知识产权争端解决功能的不同表达。这些不同协定在条约整体框架下呈现的多元化特征,构成了类型化诉求的必要性来源。以共存关系为类属研究切入点的知识产权协定,架置于整体的国际法律环境中,对厘清各协定间由来已久的复杂关系并针对性指明将来的弥合进路具有参考意义。Intellectual property rights is an important aspect of international economic and trade ex-changes and a significant concern for various international agreements.Due to various external factors,implementation and unification of the provisions on intellectual property rights in existing international a-greements are challenging,and the treaty relationships are already complex and intertwined,which makes hierarchies of articles and boundaries of applicable regulations more ambiguous in each agreement.In each agreement,different legislative levels,positions,and interest demands further pro-mote the different expressions of the settlement functions for intellectual property rights disputes.The di-verse characteristics presented by these different agreements within the overall framework of the treaty constitute the necessary source of typological requirements.The intellectual property rights agreement,which takes the coexistence relationship as the entry point for typological research,is placed in the over-all international legal environment and serves as a reference in clarifying the long-standing complex rela-tionships between agreements and pointing out the targeted ways to bridge them in the future.

关 键 词：知识产权 争端解决 RCEP 类型化 冲突与弥合 

分 类 号：D913.4[政治法律—民商法学]