检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宇轩 梁潇[1] 吴奋陟[1] 张成渝 WANG Yuxuan;LIANG Xiao;WU Fenzhi;ZHANG Chenyu(Beijing Institute of Control Engineering,Beijing 100094,China)
出 处:《空间控制技术与应用》2025年第1期43-53,共11页Aerospace Control and Application
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(52405247)。
摘 要:针对传统清晰度评价方法存在曲线平坦、多峰甚至误判的问题,提出一种结合多区域窗口的梯度阈值清晰度评价方法.利用梯度图像的对比度和加权方差计算分割阈值,提取图像的边缘点,对边缘点采用改进的能量梯度函数得到区域图像的清晰度评价结果,对不同区域图像的评价值赋予不同的权重,得到整幅图像的评价结果.本文方法与传统方法进行对比,结果表明采用同一评价函数时,多区域窗口相较于传统窗口,评价曲线单峰、无误判.本文方法灵敏度因子比传统方法的最优结果平均提升55.6%,陡峭度平均提升58.3%,该方法可为空间光学传感器自动调焦应用提供有效的参考依据.To address the issues of flat curves,multi-peaks,and misjudgments in traditional sharpness evaluation methods,a gradient threshold-based sharpness evaluation method combining multiple region windows is proposed.The method utilizes the contrast and weighted variance of the gradient image to calculate a segmentation threshold and extract edge points.An improved energy gradient function is then applied to evaluate the sharpness of the region image at the edge points.Different weights are assigned to the evaluation values of various regions to obtain the final evaluation result for the entire image.Comparing this method with traditional approaches,the results show that when using the same evaluation function,the multi-region window produces a unimodal evaluation curve without misjudgments,in contrast to the traditional window.The sensitivity factor of this method is,on average,55.6% higher,and the steepness is 58.3% higher than the optimal results from traditional methods.Therefore,the proposed method can provide an effective reference for automatic focusing applications in space optical sensors.
分 类 号:V44[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.157.86