实质解释论视域下非法占用农用地罪核心要素的司法认定  

Judicial Confirmation of the Core Factor of the Crime of Illegally Occupying Agricultural Land from the Perspective of Material Interpretation Theory

作　　者：王胜华[1] 杨旭升 WANG Sheng-hua;YANG Xu-sheng(School of Law,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,Xinjiang,China)

机构地区：[1]石河子大学法学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期88-97,共10页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“新时代新疆反恐的成功经验研究”(21BFX063)。

摘　　要：在大保护、大开放、高质量发展的背景下,非法占用农用地罪中“改变被占用土地用途”的准确判定捉襟见肘。主要表现为土地性质的认定存在歧见、“改变行为”的认定存在差异以及“非法占用”与“改变用途”的关系有待厘清。宜从实质解释论的角度出发,聚焦农用地的生态环境属性来确定生态法益为该罪保护的主要法益,以规划地类标准来认定“被占用土地”的性质,秉持生态法益立场来断定“改变行为”的本质,采用实质解释方法来界定“非法占用”与“改变用途”之间的并列关系。Under the background of large-scale protection,large-scale opening-up and high-quality development,the accurate confirmation of“changing the use of occupied land”in the crime of illegal occupation of agricultural land is overstretched.The main manifestations are that there are differences in the determination of the nature of land,differences in the determination of“change of behavior”,and the relationship between“illegal occupation”and“change of use”needs to be clarified.From the perspective of material interpretation,this paper focuses on the ecological and environmental attributes of agricultural land to determine the ecological legal interests as the main legal interests of the protection of this crime,identifies the nature of“occupied land”by the standard of planning land type,and determines the nature of“change behavior”by upholding ecological legal interests,and uses material interpretation methods to define the juxtaposition between“illegal occupation”and“change of use”.

关 键 词：非法占用农用地罪 土地性质 改变用途 生态法益 实质解释论 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]