论AIGC作品独创性司法认定标准的构建——基于提示词创作范式下的再思考  

Constructing Judicial Standards for Determining the Originality of AIGC Works:A Reconsideration Based on the Prompt-Driven Creative Paradigm

作　　者：何炼红[1] 谢天艺 He Lianhong;Xie Tianyi

机构地区：[1]中南大学知识产权研究院 [2]中南大学法学院

出　　处：《中国版权》2025年第1期48-64,共17页China Copyright

基　　金：湖南省社会科学基金重点项目“数字环境下开放存取版权问题研究”(项目编号:23ZDB001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：大模型时代,AIGC作品的独创性认定标准是版权司法实践中的一个核心问题,当前各国就AIGC作品独创性标准尚未达成共识。鉴于AIGC具有数据驱动特征,创作过程中数智技术客观化程度增强,形成统一独创性司法认定标准具有可行性。以独创性主观标准为基础,以人类干预原则为前提,构建AIGC人类干预司法判断模型,可回应独创性主观标准中人格因素的客观化与门槛问题,为AIGC独创性判断提供程式化、客观化指引。提示词在AIGC创作中发挥引导创作方向、决定内容质量、影响生成内容独创性的核心作用。运用司法判断模型应考量包括提示词在内的诸多要素,它们共同构成AIGC作品独创性的判断基础。In the era of large models,the criterion for determining the originality of AIGC works is a central issue in copyright judicial practice.Currently,there is no consensus among countries regarding the standard for originality of AIGC works.Given the data-driven nature of AIGC and the increasing objectification of intelligence technologies in the creative process,it is feasible to establish a unified judicial standard for determining originality.By building upon the subjective standard of originality and premising on the principle of human intervention,a judicial judgment model for AIGC based on human intervention can address the objectification and threshold issues of personality factors in the subjective standard of originality,providing procedural and objective guidelines for assessing the originality of AIGC.Prompt words play a pivotal role in guiding the creative direction,determining the content quality,and influencing the originality of AIGC outputs.In applying the judicial judgment model,various factors,including prompt words,should be considered,as they collectively form the basis for assessing the originality of AIGC works.

关 键 词：AIGC作品 独创性标准 人类干预 提示词 司法判断模型 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]