何谓实质性的真理论?  

What is Substantive Theory of Truth?

作　　者：周振忠[1,2] Zhenzhong Zhou

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所 [2]中山大学哲学系

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2025年第1期93-109,共17页Studies in Logic

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“西方语言哲学前沿问题研究”(23&ZD240)。

摘　　要：真理论研究分为两条主线或两大对立的阵营,即实质论和收缩论。鉴于实质论与收缩论之争是当前真理论的核心争论,似乎亟需回答何谓实质论,何谓收缩论,划界的标准是什么(或者是否存在)这样的问题。但实际上所谓的实质性有多个维度,并不存在所有实质性真理论共有的定义特征,从而实质性真理论只是一组家族相似的理论。此外,实质性有不同的程度(将以符合论为例加以说明),这使得实质论/收缩论的界限变得模糊。在构建实质性真理论的时候,应避免过度实质化。过度实质化将使得适真性范围变窄。多元论是当代实质论的代表,也是过度实质化的典型,它违背了本体论的经济性,丧失了理论的简单性。Theories of truth are divided into two main strands or opposing camps: substantivism and deflationism. Since the debate between substantivism and deflationism is at the heart of contemporary research on theories of truth, it seems that we need to answer questions such as what is substantivism, what is deflationism, and how to(or can we) demarcate the boundary between them? But in fact the alleged substantiveness is multidimensional, and there in no defining characteristic shared by all substantive theories of truth, which accordingly are mere family resemblances. Besides, substantiveness is a matter of degree, and so the boundary between substantivism and deflationism is blurred. It should not be over-substantive in constructing a substantive theory of truth.Over-substantiation would narrow down the range of truth-aptness. Pluralism, the representative of contemporary substantivism, is a typical case of over-substantiation. It violates the principle of ontological parsimony and loses theoretical simplicity.

关 键 词：真理论 实质论 收缩论 多元论 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]