煤炭资源枯竭区不同模式村庄整治对农户生计适应性选择的影响——以苏北、鲁南地区典型村庄为例  

The impact of different modes of village consolidation on the adaptive choice of household livelihood in coal resource-exhausted areas: A case study of typical villages in Northern Jiangsu and Southern Shandong of China

作　　者：杨斌 马晓涵 宋小青[3] 杨剩富 YANG Bin;MA Xiao-han;SONG Xiao-qing;YANG Sheng-fu(School of Public Policy&Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221008,Jiangsu,China;Research Center for Land Use and Ecological Security Governance in Mining Areas,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221008,Jiangsu,China;School of Geography and Information Engineering,China University of Geosciences(Wuhan),Wuhan 430070,China;School of Public Administration,China University of Geosciences(Wuhan),Wuhan 430074,China)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学公共管理学院,徐州221008 [2]中国矿业大学矿区土地利用与生态安全治理研究中心,徐州221008 [3]中国地质大学(武汉)地理与信息工程学院,武汉430070 [4]中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《自然资源学报》2025年第2期534-549,共16页Journal of Natural Resources

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(42201270);中国矿业大学中央高校基本科研业务费社科基金交叉学科研究专项(2024JCXKSK07)。

摘　　要：探究煤炭资源枯竭区村庄整治对农户生计适应性选择的影响,对于提升矿区农户生活质量以及促进宜居宜业和美乡村建设具有重要的现实意义。从“生计福祉—生态依赖”视角构建农户生计适应性选择概念框架,并基于苏北、鲁南地区典型资源枯竭村庄农户调查数据对生计福祉和生态系统服务依赖度水平进行量化,运用PSM-DID模型分析不同村庄整治模式对农户生计适应性选择的影响。结果表明:(1)压煤搬迁型、特色提升型和整治完善型三种村庄整治模式后农户福祉水平均呈现较大提升;压煤搬迁型农户生态系统服务依赖度指数小幅上升,特色提升型有所下降,整治完善型变化不显著。(2)压煤搬迁型、特色提升型和整治完善型三种整治模式促使农户“生计福祉—生态依赖”耦合关系实现“高福祉—低依赖”转换概率分别为20.0%、43.7%和21.6%,均对农户适应性产生正向影响。(3)不同整治模式对农户适应性选择影响存在差异,其中特色提升型作用效果最好,整治完善型其次,压煤搬迁型最小。基于此,今后不仅要继续加大煤炭资源枯竭区村庄整治投资力度,还要因地制宜选择整治模式,制定差别化村庄发展方案,促进农户“生计福祉—生态依赖”关系耦合优化。The adaptability selection of household livelihood in coal resource-exhausted areas is of great significance to improve the quality of households'life and promote the construction of livable and viable rural areas.Based on household survey data in typical resource-depleted villages in Northern Jiangsu and Southern Shandong of China,we quantified the levels of livelihood well-being and ecosystem service dependence.Besides,Propensity Score Matching with Difference-in-Differences model(PSM-DID)were used to analyze the impacts of three modes of village consolidation(VC),i.e.,village migration consolidation,characteristic village consolidation,and rural infrastructure renovation on livelihood adaptive selection.The results showed that:(1)The average household well-being levels of all the three modes have been improved to some extent.The index of ecosystem service dependence increased slightly after village migration consolidation,that of characteristic village consolidation decreased,and that of rural infrastructure renovation did not change significantly.(2)The probabilities of"high well-being and low dependence"transformation of the coupling relationship after the three modes of VC were 20.0%,43.7%and 21.6%,respectively.This means that VC had a positive impact on household livelihood adaptability.(3)There were some differences in the influence of different modes on household livelihood adaptability.Among them,the effect of characteristic village consolidation was the best,followed by that of rural infrastructure renovation,and that of village migration consolidation was last.Finally,some suggestions have been put forward.On the one hand,it is necessary to increase investments in the VC.On the other hand,the VC should be implemented according to local conditions to formulate differentiated village development plans.Thus,the coupling relationship optimization of household well-being and ecological dependence can be promoted.

关 键 词：村庄整治 生计福祉 生态依赖 适应性 资源枯竭区 

分 类 号：F426.21[经济管理—产业经济] F323.8