马克思对约翰·穆勒分配观的批判及其方法论意义  

Criticism from Karl Marx to John Stuart Mill on the Distribution Theory and Its Methodological Significance

作　　者：王晓菲 WANG Xiao-fei(School of Marxism,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院,北京100872

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第6期37-42,共6页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国人民大学“求是学术-栋梁”项目(项目批准号:RUC24QSDL048);中国人民大学马克思主义学院科研基金项目(项目批准号:581123031621)。

摘　　要：《〈政治经济学批判大纲〉导言》内含丰富的理论思想,马克思在此考察了生产总体四环节的辩证关系。其中,在生产与分配的关系问题上,以约翰·穆勒为代表的资产阶级经济学家形而上学地割裂了生产与分配的关系,将生产看作自然规律,分配看作社会规律。正是在批判扬弃约翰·穆勒分配观的基础上,马克思基于唯物辩证法澄清了生产与分配之间的辩证关系,并以总体性方法把握生产与分配是统一于生产总体的内在要素,从而实现了对约翰·穆勒的超越。马克思在从事政治经济学批判过程中凸显的方法论,对于指导中国特色社会主义实践具有重要意义。The Introduction to the Outline of Critique of Political Economy contains rich theoretical thoughts,in which Karl Marx examined the dialectical relationship between the four links of production as a whole.Among them,on the issue of the rela-tionship between production and distribution,bourgeois economists represented by John Stuart Mill metaphysically separated the relationship between production and distribution,regarding production as the law of nature and distribution as the law of society.It is on the basis of criticizing and sublating John Mill's view of distribution that Karl Marx clarified the dialectical relationship be-tween production and distribution based on the materialist dialectics,and grasped that production and distribution are the internal elements unified in the overall production through a holistic approach,thus realizing a transcendence of John Mill.The methodol-ogy highlighted by Marx in the process of political economy criticism is of great significance to guide the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：生产 分配 政治经济学批判 辩证法 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]