北京市属公立医院纪检部门的日常监督现状分析与对策探讨  

Current status and countermeasures of routine supervision by disciplinary inspection departments in Beijing municipal public hospitals

作　　者：徐爱萍 李春霞 李静 田昕 Xu Aiping;Li Chunxia;Li Jing;Tian Xin(Disciplinary Office,Beijing Ditan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100015,China;Beijing Ditan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100015,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院纪检办公室,北京100015 [2]首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院,北京100015

出　　处：《中华医院管理杂志》2024年第11期888-893,共6页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration

基　　金：北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PG20231802)。

摘　　要：目的分析公立医院纪检部门日常监督现状及存在的问题,并探讨对策,以期为完善纪检监督管理提供参考。方法2023年1月,选取19家北京市属医院的专职纪检干部为调查对象,采用自制问卷,通过问卷星平台进行问卷调查,了解各公立医院纪检部门的日常监督现状,对问卷数据进行描述性分析;2023年10—12月,选取8家北京市属医院的12名专职纪检干部为访谈对象,围绕如何有效开展日常监督、如何发挥纪委委员和支部纪检委员的作用进行面对面访谈,采用Colaizzi七步法分析访谈数据。结果共回收有效问卷41份。结果显示,北京市属医院的日常监督事项主要为政治监督和对权力运行关键环节的监督,包括中央八项规定精神及其实施细则的执行情况(40人,97.6%),干部选拔任用(40人,97.6%),党员及党员领导干部执行党的纪律情况(39人,95.1%),国家、北京市及上级部门重大决策部署落实情况(38人,92.7%)等;主要通过会议监督(41人,100.0%)、协作监督(41人,100.0%)、专项监督(40人,97.6%)及信访监督(40人,97.6%)等路径开展日常监督;日常监督的薄弱环节主要包括对党委的同级监督不够(29人,70.7%)等。缺乏"互联网络""大数据"等信息技术手段(26人,63.4%)、纪检干部接受专业知识培训不够及缺乏专业人员(26人,63.4%)、纪检干部监督能力不足(26人,63.4%)、日常监督方法不多(26人,63.4%)、创新监督方式不够(26人,63.4%)等因素影响了日常监督效果。分析访谈资料获得5个主题:构建监督体系、把握日常监督的重点内容、优化日常监督方式、丰富监督路径、加强廉洁文化和纪检干部队伍建设。结论北京市属公立医院纪检部门的日常监督效能还需进一步提升,建议从加强纪检监督体系建设、提升纪检监督效能、强化信息化监督手段、完善纪检干部队伍建设方面进一步完善相关工作。Objective To analyze the current status of routine supervision by the discipline inspection departments of public hospitals and the existing problems,and discussion of countermeasures,in order to provide reference for improving the supervision and management of discipline inspection.Methods In January 2023,19 full-time discipline inspection cadres from Beijing municipal public hospitals were selected as the subjects of the investigation.A self-made questionnaire was used,and the survey was conducted through the Questionnaire Star platform to understand the current status of routine supervision by discipline inspection departments in various public hospitals,with descriptive analysis of the questionnaire data.From October to December 2023,12 full-time discipline inspection cadres from 8 Beijing municipal public hospitals were selected as interview subjects.Face-to-face interviews were conducted on how to effectively carry out routine supervision and how to utilize the roles of discipline committee members and branch discipline inspection committee members,with Colaizzi′s seven-step method used to analyze the interview data.Results 41 valid questionnaires were collected.The results showed that the routine supervision matters mainly involved political supervision and supervision of key links in the operation of power,including the implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and their detailed rules(40 people,97.6%),the selection and appointment of cadres(40 people,97.6%),the execution of party discipline by party members and leading cadres(39 people,95.1%),and the implementation of significant decisions and deployments by the state,Beijing municipal and higher-level departments(38 people,92.7%),etc.;routine supervision was mainly carried out through meeting supervision(41 people,100.0%),collaborative supervision(41 people,100.0%),special supervision(40 people,97.6%),and letter and visit supervision(40 people,97.6%);the weakness in routine supervision mainly included insufficient supervision of the party commit

关 键 词：医院 公立 纪检 高质量发展 监督 北京市属医院 

分 类 号：R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]