检验检测报告的实质性质证方法  

Substantive Cross-Examination Methods for Inspection and Testing Reports

作　　者：郝孝伟 史文洁 HAO Xiao-wei;SHI Wen-jie(Beijing Yingke(Wuxi)Law Firm,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]北京市盈科(无锡)律师事务所,江苏无锡214000

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期90-102,共13页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：现行法律规范中关于鉴定意见的质证规则已经有比较系统、全面的规定,但是关于检验检测报告的质证规范不仅效力级别不够高,而且非常零散,甚至有些地方还存在冲突。司法实践中,检验检测报告形式化质证和认定的问题非常普遍。本文针对性地提出关于检验检测报告的实质性质证思路和方法。实质性质证思路方面,本文从资质认定证书的有无、检验检测与司法鉴定的异同两个方面展开分析,并以此为基础逐步展开关于检验检测报告的实质性质证方法的论述,其中包括资质审查、检材和样品审查、检验检测过程审查、检验检测方法审查和关联性审查等五个方面。The current legal regulations have relatively systematic and comprehensive provisions for the cross-examination of expert opinions,but the provisions on the cross-examination of inspection and testing reports are not only of low effectiveness,but also very scattered,and there are even conflicts in some places.In practice,the problem of formal cross-examination and recognition of inspection and testing reports is still very common.This paper proposes a targeted approach to the substantive examination of inspection and testing reports.In terms of substantive examination,this paper analyzes the presence or absence of qualification certification and the similarities and differences between inspection and testing and judicial identification from two perspectives,and then builds on this basis to gradually elaborate on the substantive examination methods of inspection and testing reports,including qualification review,examination of specimens and samples,examination of inspection and testing processes,examination of inspection and testing methods,and examination of relevance.

关 键 词：检验报告 检测报告 质证思路 质证方法 

分 类 号：D923.99[政治法律—民商法学]