规制趋同视野下新型FTAs的气候变化规则  

Regulatory Convergence of New FTAs Climate Change Rules and Regulations

作　　者：郑玲丽[1] ZHENG Lingli

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2025年第2期75-90,共16页International Business Research

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划基金项目“CPTPP环境争端解决机制研究”(项目编号:23YJA820033)。

摘　　要：贸易和气候变化的议题交叉引发应对气候变化的国际贸易规则碎片化,气候变化和贸易之间制度性体系整合应成为国际贸易法的规范导向。国际气候公约在国际贸易法领域得到落实与创新,实现了贸易与气候变化的初次规则趋同。《巴黎协定》生效以来,CPTPP等新型FTAs实现了贸易与气候变化的二次规则趋同。然而,新型FTAs形成“气候俱乐部”存在若干理论逻辑漏洞和实践运行困境,有违公平正义。从规制趋同视角来看,需要全球优化配置国际贸易体系的气候变化规则。我国应从人类命运共同体角度出发,通过“一带一路”FTAs应对气候变化,转危为机,积极探索在国际贸易法领域整合气候条款的中国式现代化方案。The intersection of trade and climate change issues leads to the fragmentation of international trade rules in response to climate change,and the integration of institutional systems between climate change and trade should become the normative orientation of international trade law.The International Climate Convention has been implemented and innovated in the field of International Trade Law,achieving the first convergence of rules on trade and climate change.Since the entry into force of the Paris Agreement,new FTAs such as the CPTPP have achieved the secondary convergence of rules on trade and climate change.However,the formation of the“climate club”by new FTAs has some theoretical and logical loopholes and practical operation difficulties,which is against fairness and justice.From the perspective of regulatory convergence,it is necessary to optimize the global allocation of climate change rules in the international trading system.From the perspective of the community of human climate destiny,China should seize the opportunity of the absence of uniform rules in the field of climate change in trade agreements,respond to the climate change crisis with the Belt and Road Initiatives through FTAs,and actively explore the Chinese-style modernization plan of integrating climate provisions in the field of International Trade Law.

关 键 词：规制趋同 新型FTAs 气候变化规则 气候俱乐部 “一带一路” 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]