检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张美仪 金童林 Zhang Meiyi;Jin Tonglin(College of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot 010022,China;Mental Health Education Research and Service Base,Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Science in Inner Mongolia Colleges and Universities,Hohhot 010022,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特010022 [2]内蒙古高校人文社科重点研究基地,心理健康教育研究与服务基地,呼和浩特010022
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2025年第1期78-82,共5页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2022MS03004)。
摘 要:目的在大学生群体中对中文版牛津广场恐怖回避量表(OAAS-C)的信效度进行检验。方法采用OAAS-C、广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)、简版流调中心抑郁量表(CESD-10)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)中的恐怖分量表对1030名中国大学生施测,其中,样本1进行通俗度检验(n=30),样本2进行项目分析和探索性分析(n=503),样本3进行验证性因素分析(n=497),2周后,对来自样本2中的60名大学生进行重测信度检验。采用SPSS 26.0和Mplus 8.3软件对数据进行统计分析。结果探索性因素分析结果表明,OAAS-C共8个条目,单维结构,总方差解释率为60.75%。验证性因素分析结果表明,OAAS-C的单因素模型拟合良好(χ^(2)/df=1.41,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.98,RMSEA=0.05);OAAS-C与GAD-7、CESD-10、SCL-90的恐怖分量表得分均呈正相关(r=0.72、0.71、0.87,均P<0.01),其组合信度为0.91,平均方差抽取量为0.55。信度检验的结果表明,该量表的Cronbach''sα系数为0.93;重测信度为0.86;分半信度为0.90。结论OAAS-C在中国大学生群体中具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为研究广场恐怖症的研究工具。ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford agoraphobic avoidance scale(OAAS-C)in Chinese college students.MethodsA total of 1030 college students were surveyed with OAAS-C,general anxiety disorder-7(GAD-7),the center for epidemiological studies depression scale-10(CESD-10)and the symptom checklist-90(SCL-90).Sample 1(n=30)was carried out for popularity test.Sample 2(n=503)was carried out for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis.Sample 3(n=497)was carried out for confirmatory factor analysis.Two weeks later,60 college students who came from sample 2 were asked to retest OAAS-C.SPSS 26.0 and Mplus 8.3 were used for data analysis.ResultsAccording to exploratory factor analysis,the OAAS-C was a single dimension scale included with 8 items,and explained 60.75%of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the single factor model fitted the data well(χ^(2)/df=1.41,CFI=0.99,TLI=0.98,RMSEA=0.05).The score of OAAS-C was positively correlated with the scores of GAD-7,CESD-10 and the agoraphobic subscale of SCL-90(r=0.72,0.71,0.87,all P<0.01).In addition,the composite reliability coefficient was 0.91 and average variance extracted coefficient was 0.55.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the OAAS-C was 0.93,the retest reliability coefficients(ICC)was 0.86,and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.90.ConclusionOAAS-C has a good reliability and validity in Chinese college students and it can be used as a research tool for agoraphobic study.
关 键 词:中文版牛津广场恐怖回避量表 大学生 广场恐怖症 信度 效度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112