基于ABSA-DANP的森林公园游憩舒适度评估  

Evaluation of recreational comfort degree in forest parks based on ABSA-DANP method

作　　者：林开淼 黄宝慧 董松萍 黄雨琪 元晓春 吴政儒 LIN Kaimiao;HUANG Baohui;DONG Songping;HUANG Yuqi;YUAN Xiaochun;WU Zhengru(College of Tourism,Wuyi University,Nanping 354300,China)

机构地区：[1]武夷学院旅游学院,南平354300

出　　处：《生态学报》2025年第4期1674-1683,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19XGL010);福建省社会科学规划基金重点项目(FJ2024A022);武夷学院教科研创新项目(WZY2023006)。

摘　　要：在生态文明建设的背景下,森林公园提供的游憩服务对提升人类健康和福祉至关重要,其舒适性体验的构成指标和评估方法备受关注。然而,仅基于初级感官体验或浅层心理认知的游憩舒适度评估是不完备的,亟需构建一个涵盖身心整体性的评估模型。以福建省内156个森林公园为对象,结合方面级情感分析(ABSA)和基于决策实验室分析的网络程序分析法(DANP),构建了一个新的森林公园游憩舒适度衡量框架,并通过中国4个典型森林公园对模型进行了实证评估。结果表明:(1)游憩舒适度涵盖了身体舒适性、心理舒适性、精神舒适性、社会舒适性4个主准则、15个次准则和290个方面术语;(2)4个主准则在方面术语情感指数加权计算后的排序与次准则一致,表明在线网络评论的情感指数可作为衡量游憩舒适度各准则的重要指标;(3)身体舒适性是影响游憩舒适度最主要因素,而心理舒适性的提升能够有效促进身体舒适性,进而改善精神舒适性与社会舒适性;(4)主准则身体舒适性、心理舒适性、精神舒适性和社会舒适性的区域权重分别为0.236、0.264、0.246、0.253。在次准则方面,情绪调节、解决心理问题和生态审美体验的重要性位列前三;(5)在4个森林公园中,总游憩舒适度大小排序为仙女山国家森林公园>大奇山国家森林公园>亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园>福建九龙谷国家森林公园。这项研究为游憩舒适度评估提供了新的视角和方法,也为森林公园游憩管理与决策支持提供了重要依据。In the context of ecological civilization construction,the recreational services provided by forest parks are crucial for enhancing human health and well-being,and their amenity experience indicators and assessment methods have attracted much attention.However,relying solely on primary sensory experiences or shallow psychological cognition to assess the degree of recreational comfort is inadequate,necessitating the establishment of an integrated assessment model that encompasses both physical and psychological dimensions.This study took 156 forest parks in Fujian Province as its subject and developed a new framework for measuring the degree of recreational comfort in forest parks by integrating Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis(ABSA)and the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-based Analytic Network Process methods(DANP),and conducted empirical assessments to validate the framework using four typical forest parks in China.The results indicated that:(1)Recreational comfort degree encompassed four main criteria:physical comfort(A1),psychological comfort(A2),spiritual comfort(A3),and social comfort(A4),along with 15 sub-criteria and 290 aspect terms.The overall frequency of terms related to recreational comfort has reached 24070 times,accounting for 39.69%of the top 500 word frequencies.The term“comfort”was mentioned 242 times in the target layer,accounting for 1.01%of all aspect terms.Among these,psychological comfort terms were most frequently mentioned,whereas social comfort terms were the least mentioned;(2)The ranking of these four main criteria based on weighted sentiment index calculations,was consistent with that of the sub-criteria.The emotional index derived from online reviews could be serve as an important indicator to measure each criterion of recreational comfort degree;(3)Physical comfort was identified as the most crucial factor influencing recreational comfort degree,while psychological comfort could effectively enhance physical comfort,thereby further improving spiritual comfort and so

关 键 词：舒适度 森林公园 文本挖掘 多标准决策 

分 类 号：F592.7[经济管理—旅游管理] S788.2[经济管理—产业经济]