“空”的设计策略研究——以S-MAO与RCR的设计策略为例  

Research on the Design Strategies of“Voidness”Taking S-MAO and RCR's Projects as Examples

作　　者：吴子豪 WU Zihao

机构地区：[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,上海200092

出　　处：《建筑学报》2025年第1期28-35,共8页Architectural Journal

摘　　要：首先探讨空与空间的差异,并借助雕塑作品总结空的基本特性,继而通过解读S-MAO和RCR的项目作品,揭示空的特性在建筑中是如何被塑造的,并对比分析了两者设计方法的差异:S-MAO是将空作为原材料与实体并置,在三维图底关系的推敲下形成设计;RCR事务所则侧重于消解实体,以使室内空间达到模糊的、虚空的状态。The paper begins by identifying the differences between voidness and space,and summarizes the basic characteristics of void as seen in sculpture.It then analyzes the projects of S-MAO and RCR to reveal how the characteristics of voidness are shaped in buildings,and compares the differences of design approaches of the two firms:S-MAO juxtaposes the void as a raw material with the solid to improve the design as of the relationship between the three-dimensional figure and ground,while RCR focuses on the dissolution of solidity in order to bring the interior space to an ambiguous and defocused state.

关 键 词：空 S-MAO RCR 并置 消解 

分 类 号：TU201[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]