中医古籍文本理论内容的标引方法及思考  

Methods and Reflections on the Citation of Theoretical Contents of Ancient Chinese Medicine Texts

作　　者：王于静 陈晗婷 王维广[1] 刘晓峰[1] 翟双庆[1] WANG Yujing;CHEN Hanting;WANG Weiguang;LIU Xiaofeng;ZHAI Shuangqing(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029

出　　处：《西部中医药》2025年第2期44-47,共4页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家中医药管理局高水平中医药重点学科建设项目(zyyzdxk-2023252);科技部科技基础资源调查专项(2022FY102000,2022FY102002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2022-JYB-JBZR-011);北京市社科基金规划项目(23LSC019)。

摘　　要：对同一段中医古籍文本理论内容进行标引,并分析不同标引方式的优点及不足,指出“病脉证并治平台”自上而下的标引方法与“经典知识平台”自下而上的标引方法在知识框架、形成知识图谱、标引自由度、标引模板等方面各有优势,应根据实际需求选择相应标引方法。并得出如有明确研究目标或需要构建完整知识框架时,应选择“病脉证并治平台”标引方法;如需求为建立相应知识图谱或需要进一步进行知识挖掘时,则选择“经典知识平台”标引方法更为恰当。By indexing theoretical contents in the same ancient Chinese medicine texts,the advantages and disadvantages of different citation methods were analyzed in the paper,the top-down citation method for"treatment platform of disease,pulse and syndrome"and bottom-up citation approach for"classic knowledge platform"have their own advantages in knowledge frameworks,forming knowledge graphs,degrees of freedom for citation and citation templates,the corresponding citation method should be chosen according to the practical need.Citation method for"treatment platform of disease,pulse and syndrome"could be selected if there are clear research objectives or the complete knowledge frameworks need to be constructed;citation approach for"classic knowledge platform"are more appropriate if the need is to establish the corresponding knowledge graphs or further knowledge mining is needed.

关 键 词：中医理论 古籍文本 知识标引 知识图谱 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]