国内外铜冶炼行业大气污染物排放标准比较  

Comparative Study on Air Pollutant Emission Standards for Domestic and International Copper Smelting Industry

作　　者：杜龙 王召启 胡俊 刘峰 赵晋 DU Long;WANG Zhaoqi;HU Jun;LIU Feng;ZHAO Jin(China Nerin Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330038,China)

机构地区：[1]中国瑞林工程技术股份有限公司,江西南昌330038

出　　处：《有色冶金设计与研究》2025年第1期33-37,共5页Nonferrous Metals Engineering & Research

摘　　要：系统比较了中国与IFC、欧盟、美国等国家及地区铜冶炼行业大气污染物排放标准的差异,重点分析污染物控制种类、排放限值、监测要求及基准参数设定等方面的异同。研究表明,中国现行标准(GB 25467—2010及地方标准)在污染物种类覆盖与监测操作性方面更为全面,其中二氧化硫特别排放限值(100 mg/m^(3))严于IFC与欧盟标准,但颗粒物限值(10 mg/m^(3))略宽于IFC标准(1~5 mg/m^(3))。为进一步提升中国铜冶炼行业大气污染治理效能,基于国内外工程经验,提出了优化基准含氧量规定、整合监测要求、调整基准排气量核算范围和方法,加强技术指南与标准的衔接等建议。The paper systematically compares the differences in the copper smelting industry's air pollutant emission standards between China and other countries&regions such as IFC,EU,and the United States,focusing on the similarities and differences in pollutant control types,emission limits,monitoring requirements,and benchmark parameter settings.The study shows that the current standards in China(GB 25467—2010 and local standards)are more comprehensive in terms of coverage of pollutant types and monitoring operability,with special emission limits for SO2(100 mg/m^(3))stricter than those of IFC and EU standards,but particulate matter limits(10 mg/m^(3))slightly less stringent than those of IFC standards(1~5 mg/m^(3)).To further enhance the effectiveness of air pollution control in China’s copper smelting industry,based on domestic and international engineering experience,the paper puts forward some suggestions to optimize the benchmark oxygen content regulations,integrate monitoring requirements,adjust the base discharge calculation scope and methods,and strengthen links between technical guidelines and standards.

关 键 词：铜冶炼 大气污染物 排放标准 国际比较 

分 类 号：X-65[环境科学与工程]