检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石晓文 SHI Xiaowen(Department of Culture and Tourism,Yuncheng University,Yuncheng 044000,Shanxi,China)
出 处:《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期1-6,16,共7页Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目:20世纪30年代的阿根廷社会转型研究(20BSS036)。
摘 要:随着19世纪末美国在拉丁美洲霸权的崛起,美国对拉丁美洲区域知识的需求与日俱增,有关拉丁美洲知识的生产与传播显得格外重要。拉丁美洲研究的源起极大地受到政治需求的影响,学术研究逐步“工具化”。知识生产逐渐与国家权力“合流”,成为国家行使外交权力的重要工具之一。在政治需求与学术兴趣共生的表层关系下,作为内生驱动力的种族偏见以及在此基础上形成的思想、价值、观念,共同构成了拉丁美洲研究的底层逻辑。这一底层逻辑一直是美国衡量拉丁美洲国家进步性和现代性的标准。With the rise of American hegemony in Latin America at the end of the 19th century,the demand for regional knowledge in Latin America is increasing day by day,and the generation and dissemination of knowledge about Latin America becomes particularly important.The origin of Latin American studies is greatly influenced by political demands,and academic research is gradually“instrumentalized”.Knowledge production gradually merges with state power and becomes one of the important tools for the state to exercise diplomatic power.Under the surface relationship between political needs and academic interests coexisting,racial prejudice as an endogenous driving force,as well as the ideas,values,and concepts formed on this basis,together constitute the underlying logic of Latin American studies.This underlying logic has always been the standard by which the United States measures the progress and modernity of Latin American countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7