罗宾斯经济哲学思想批判及其启示  

Criticism of Robbins’Economic Philosophy and Its Implications

作　　者：朱成全 郭志娟 Zhu Chengquan;Guo Zhijuan

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学马克思主义学院 [2]东北财经大学经济学院

出　　处：《政治经济学研究》2024年第4期99-108,共10页Chinese Journal of Political Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“共同富裕与人的自由全面发展统一性研究”(22BKS175);中央社会主义学院统一战线高端智库课题“中国式现代化的中华优秀传统文化基因研究”(ZK202302112)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：马克思主义政治经济学的研究对象是生产方式,而罗宾斯的经济学稀缺定义是基于西方经济学流行的定义,并不研究所有制,于是,便出现了罗宾斯对马克思的批判。这表现在:罗宾斯把马克思的经济学定义看成是“粗浅的唯物主义”的经济学定义、把唯物史观看成是经济史观;罗宾斯认为,经济学不关注目的本身,因而是“价值中立”的,而马克思则不然。从物质和意识、目的和手段的辩证关系分析,罗宾斯的辩证法思想是自发的朴素的辩证法,马克思的辩证法是自觉的理论层次的辩证法,可以推论罗宾斯对马克思的唯物主义批判是错误的,马克思的经济学定义比罗宾斯的经济学定义更具有理论自信。但是,不同于对马克思抱极端敌视态度的经济学家,罗宾斯也肯定了马克思许多重要的理论贡献。再结合马克思主义的观点和一些西方经济学家等对罗宾斯的批判,可以判断得出:罗宾斯经济学的合理性可以被马克思主义政治经济学辩证借鉴。The research object of Marxist political economy is the mode of production,while Robbins’definition of economic scarcity is a popular definition in Western economics,which does not study ownership.Therefore,Robbins’criticism of Marx emerged.This is reflected in Robbins’view of Marx’s economic definition as a“rudimentary materialist”economic definition and the materialist view of history as an economic view of history;Robbins believed that economics does not focus on the purpose itself,therefore,economics is“value neutral”,while Marx is not.From the dialectical relationship between matter and consciousness,purpose and means,Robbins’dialectical thought is spontaneous and naive dialectics,while Marx’s dialectics is at the conscious theoretical level.Therefore,Robbins’critique of Marx’s materialism is incorrect,and Marx’s economic definition has more theoretical confidence than Robbins’economic definition.However,Robbins,unlike economists who held extreme hostility towards Marx,affirmed many important theoretical contributions of Marx.Combined with the viewpoints of Marxism and the criticism of Robbins by some Western economists,it can be concluded that the rationality of Robbins economics can be incorporated into Marxist political economy.

关 键 词：罗宾斯 马克思 经济哲学 批判 

分 类 号：F06[经济管理—政治经济学]